Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults

Triceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiros Karamanidis, Gaspar Epro, Matthias König, Falk Mersmann, Adamantios Arampatzis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/full
id doaj-a0598f4d662c4557a1f2e08298fe3fba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0598f4d662c4557a1f2e08298fe3fba2020-11-25T02:06:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-10-011010.3389/fphys.2019.01299481321Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older AdultsKiros Karamanidis0Gaspar Epro1Matthias König2Falk Mersmann3Falk Mersmann4Adamantios Arampatzis5Adamantios Arampatzis6School of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomSchool of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomSchool of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyTriceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume assessment is also applicable in older adults or if muscle-specific shape changes with aging. MRI sequences were taken from the dominant leg of 21 older female adults. The boundaries of all three TS muscles (SOL, soleus; GM, gastrocnemius medialis; GL, gastrocnemius lateralis) were manually outlined in transverse image sequences, and muscle volume for each muscle was calculated as the integral of the obtained cross-sectional areas of the contours along the whole length of the muscle (measured volume) and, in addition, by using the average muscle-specific shape factors of each muscle obtained from the ratio of the measured volume and the product of ACSAmax and the muscle length (estimated volume). There were no differences in the measured and estimated muscle volumes (SOL: 357.7 ± 61.8 vs. 358.8 ± 65.3 cm3; GM: 179.5 ± 32.8 vs. 179.8 ± 33.3 cm3; GL: 90.2 ± 15.9 vs. 90.4 ± 14.8 cm3). However, when using the reported shape factors of younger adults instead, we found a significant (p < 0.05) overestimation of muscle volume for SOL and GM with average RMS differences of 6.1 and 7.6%, respectively. These results indicate that corrections of muscle-specific shape factors are needed when using the previously proposed simplified muscle volume assessment as aging may not only be accompanied with muscle atrophy but also changes in the shape of skeletal muscle.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/fullmagnetic resonance imagingagedmuscle reconstructionmuscle volumeshape factor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiros Karamanidis
Gaspar Epro
Matthias König
Falk Mersmann
Falk Mersmann
Adamantios Arampatzis
Adamantios Arampatzis
spellingShingle Kiros Karamanidis
Gaspar Epro
Matthias König
Falk Mersmann
Falk Mersmann
Adamantios Arampatzis
Adamantios Arampatzis
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
Frontiers in Physiology
magnetic resonance imaging
aged
muscle reconstruction
muscle volume
shape factor
author_facet Kiros Karamanidis
Gaspar Epro
Matthias König
Falk Mersmann
Falk Mersmann
Adamantios Arampatzis
Adamantios Arampatzis
author_sort Kiros Karamanidis
title Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
title_short Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
title_full Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
title_fullStr Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
title_sort simplified triceps surae muscle volume assessment in older adults
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Triceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume assessment is also applicable in older adults or if muscle-specific shape changes with aging. MRI sequences were taken from the dominant leg of 21 older female adults. The boundaries of all three TS muscles (SOL, soleus; GM, gastrocnemius medialis; GL, gastrocnemius lateralis) were manually outlined in transverse image sequences, and muscle volume for each muscle was calculated as the integral of the obtained cross-sectional areas of the contours along the whole length of the muscle (measured volume) and, in addition, by using the average muscle-specific shape factors of each muscle obtained from the ratio of the measured volume and the product of ACSAmax and the muscle length (estimated volume). There were no differences in the measured and estimated muscle volumes (SOL: 357.7 ± 61.8 vs. 358.8 ± 65.3 cm3; GM: 179.5 ± 32.8 vs. 179.8 ± 33.3 cm3; GL: 90.2 ± 15.9 vs. 90.4 ± 14.8 cm3). However, when using the reported shape factors of younger adults instead, we found a significant (p < 0.05) overestimation of muscle volume for SOL and GM with average RMS differences of 6.1 and 7.6%, respectively. These results indicate that corrections of muscle-specific shape factors are needed when using the previously proposed simplified muscle volume assessment as aging may not only be accompanied with muscle atrophy but also changes in the shape of skeletal muscle.
topic magnetic resonance imaging
aged
muscle reconstruction
muscle volume
shape factor
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kiroskaramanidis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT gasparepro simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT matthiaskonig simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT falkmersmann simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT falkmersmann simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT adamantiosarampatzis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
AT adamantiosarampatzis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults
_version_ 1724932168385298432