Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults
Triceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume as...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/full |
id |
doaj-a0598f4d662c4557a1f2e08298fe3fba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0598f4d662c4557a1f2e08298fe3fba2020-11-25T02:06:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-10-011010.3389/fphys.2019.01299481321Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older AdultsKiros Karamanidis0Gaspar Epro1Matthias König2Falk Mersmann3Falk Mersmann4Adamantios Arampatzis5Adamantios Arampatzis6School of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomSchool of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomSchool of Applied Sciences, Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, London South Bank University, London, United KingdomDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyTriceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume assessment is also applicable in older adults or if muscle-specific shape changes with aging. MRI sequences were taken from the dominant leg of 21 older female adults. The boundaries of all three TS muscles (SOL, soleus; GM, gastrocnemius medialis; GL, gastrocnemius lateralis) were manually outlined in transverse image sequences, and muscle volume for each muscle was calculated as the integral of the obtained cross-sectional areas of the contours along the whole length of the muscle (measured volume) and, in addition, by using the average muscle-specific shape factors of each muscle obtained from the ratio of the measured volume and the product of ACSAmax and the muscle length (estimated volume). There were no differences in the measured and estimated muscle volumes (SOL: 357.7 ± 61.8 vs. 358.8 ± 65.3 cm3; GM: 179.5 ± 32.8 vs. 179.8 ± 33.3 cm3; GL: 90.2 ± 15.9 vs. 90.4 ± 14.8 cm3). However, when using the reported shape factors of younger adults instead, we found a significant (p < 0.05) overestimation of muscle volume for SOL and GM with average RMS differences of 6.1 and 7.6%, respectively. These results indicate that corrections of muscle-specific shape factors are needed when using the previously proposed simplified muscle volume assessment as aging may not only be accompanied with muscle atrophy but also changes in the shape of skeletal muscle.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/fullmagnetic resonance imagingagedmuscle reconstructionmuscle volumeshape factor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kiros Karamanidis Gaspar Epro Matthias König Falk Mersmann Falk Mersmann Adamantios Arampatzis Adamantios Arampatzis |
spellingShingle |
Kiros Karamanidis Gaspar Epro Matthias König Falk Mersmann Falk Mersmann Adamantios Arampatzis Adamantios Arampatzis Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults Frontiers in Physiology magnetic resonance imaging aged muscle reconstruction muscle volume shape factor |
author_facet |
Kiros Karamanidis Gaspar Epro Matthias König Falk Mersmann Falk Mersmann Adamantios Arampatzis Adamantios Arampatzis |
author_sort |
Kiros Karamanidis |
title |
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults |
title_short |
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults |
title_full |
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults |
title_fullStr |
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simplified Triceps Surae Muscle Volume Assessment in Older Adults |
title_sort |
simplified triceps surae muscle volume assessment in older adults |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physiology |
issn |
1664-042X |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Triceps surae (TS) muscle volume can be estimated in young adults by only considering the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and the length of the muscle due to the presence of a constant muscle-specific shape factor. This study aimed to investigate if this simplified muscle volume assessment is also applicable in older adults or if muscle-specific shape changes with aging. MRI sequences were taken from the dominant leg of 21 older female adults. The boundaries of all three TS muscles (SOL, soleus; GM, gastrocnemius medialis; GL, gastrocnemius lateralis) were manually outlined in transverse image sequences, and muscle volume for each muscle was calculated as the integral of the obtained cross-sectional areas of the contours along the whole length of the muscle (measured volume) and, in addition, by using the average muscle-specific shape factors of each muscle obtained from the ratio of the measured volume and the product of ACSAmax and the muscle length (estimated volume). There were no differences in the measured and estimated muscle volumes (SOL: 357.7 ± 61.8 vs. 358.8 ± 65.3 cm3; GM: 179.5 ± 32.8 vs. 179.8 ± 33.3 cm3; GL: 90.2 ± 15.9 vs. 90.4 ± 14.8 cm3). However, when using the reported shape factors of younger adults instead, we found a significant (p < 0.05) overestimation of muscle volume for SOL and GM with average RMS differences of 6.1 and 7.6%, respectively. These results indicate that corrections of muscle-specific shape factors are needed when using the previously proposed simplified muscle volume assessment as aging may not only be accompanied with muscle atrophy but also changes in the shape of skeletal muscle. |
topic |
magnetic resonance imaging aged muscle reconstruction muscle volume shape factor |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01299/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kiroskaramanidis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT gasparepro simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT matthiaskonig simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT falkmersmann simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT falkmersmann simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT adamantiosarampatzis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults AT adamantiosarampatzis simplifiedtricepssuraemusclevolumeassessmentinolderadults |
_version_ |
1724932168385298432 |