Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire

The Liao shi [Liaoshi] (遼史) suggests that in 926 the Liao empire destroyed the state of Bohai, and afterward forced the Bohai people into servitude and resettlement across the empire. Modern archaeology together with epigraphical sources in the Kitan language confirm some of this narrative, but sugg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pamela Kyle Crossley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea University, Center for Korean History 2016-02-01
Series:International Journal of Korean History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-11.pdf
id doaj-a047b98d28f444ccb3fad5ef43e9c076
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a047b98d28f444ccb3fad5ef43e9c0762020-11-24T22:40:17ZengKorea University, Center for Korean HistoryInternational Journal of Korean History1598-20412016-02-01211114410.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.1110Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao EmpirePamela Kyle Crossley0Collis Professor, Department of History, Dartmouth CollegeThe Liao shi [Liaoshi] (遼史) suggests that in 926 the Liao empire destroyed the state of Bohai, and afterward forced the Bohai people into servitude and resettlement across the empire. Modern archaeology together with epigraphical sources in the Kitan language confirm some of this narrative, but suggest a far more complicated story. Researches by scholars such as Aisingioro Ulhicun, Yoshimoto Michimasa, Im Sangsŏn, Sawamoto Mitsuhiro and Wang Shanjun have shed new light on the political circumstances of the Liao invasion of Bohai in 926 and the subsequent status of its inhabitants. A majority of the Bohai population remained in their traditional territories, where Bohai aristocrats, soldiers and high-ranking officials retained distinct roles in local administration. This essay looks at Bohai influence upon Liao administrative practices, the status of Bohai aristocrats of the Da lineage and elites such as Gao Mohan, and the probable outlines of Bohai demography to suggest that the Bohai role in transmission of Northeastern political traditions, in particular, may have been much more important than would be suggested on the basis of standard literary resources. Instead of being a doomed people whose identities and social structures evaporated after Liao resettlement policies stranded them in remote and inhospitable surroundings, the Bohai story may actually be one of political continuity and a seminal influence upon their successors, the Jurchens and ultimately the Manchus.http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-11.pdfBohaiLiaoDongdanDan gurGao Mohan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pamela Kyle Crossley
spellingShingle Pamela Kyle Crossley
Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
International Journal of Korean History
Bohai
Liao
Dongdan
Dan gur
Gao Mohan
author_facet Pamela Kyle Crossley
author_sort Pamela Kyle Crossley
title Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
title_short Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
title_full Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
title_fullStr Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
title_full_unstemmed Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
title_sort bohai/parhae identity and the coherence of dan gur under the kitan/liao empire
publisher Korea University, Center for Korean History
series International Journal of Korean History
issn 1598-2041
publishDate 2016-02-01
description The Liao shi [Liaoshi] (遼史) suggests that in 926 the Liao empire destroyed the state of Bohai, and afterward forced the Bohai people into servitude and resettlement across the empire. Modern archaeology together with epigraphical sources in the Kitan language confirm some of this narrative, but suggest a far more complicated story. Researches by scholars such as Aisingioro Ulhicun, Yoshimoto Michimasa, Im Sangsŏn, Sawamoto Mitsuhiro and Wang Shanjun have shed new light on the political circumstances of the Liao invasion of Bohai in 926 and the subsequent status of its inhabitants. A majority of the Bohai population remained in their traditional territories, where Bohai aristocrats, soldiers and high-ranking officials retained distinct roles in local administration. This essay looks at Bohai influence upon Liao administrative practices, the status of Bohai aristocrats of the Da lineage and elites such as Gao Mohan, and the probable outlines of Bohai demography to suggest that the Bohai role in transmission of Northeastern political traditions, in particular, may have been much more important than would be suggested on the basis of standard literary resources. Instead of being a doomed people whose identities and social structures evaporated after Liao resettlement policies stranded them in remote and inhospitable surroundings, the Bohai story may actually be one of political continuity and a seminal influence upon their successors, the Jurchens and ultimately the Manchus.
topic Bohai
Liao
Dongdan
Dan gur
Gao Mohan
url http://ijkh.khistory.org/upload/pdf/ijkh-21-1-11.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pamelakylecrossley bohaiparhaeidentityandthecoherenceofdangurunderthekitanliaoempire
_version_ 1725705103240855552