Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?

The evolution of a microcanonical statistical ensemble of states of isolated systems from order to disorder as determined by increasing entropy, is compared to an alternative evolution that is determined by mixing character. The fact that the partitions of an integer N are in one-to-one corresponden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William Seitz, A. D. Kirwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-07-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/16/7/3793
id doaj-a03f89827319407eb7b38a8679ab2f17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a03f89827319407eb7b38a8679ab2f172020-11-24T23:48:46ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002014-07-011673793380710.3390/e16073793e16073793Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?William Seitz0A. D. Kirwan1Department of Marine Sciences, Texas A&M University at Galveston, P.O. Box 1675, Galveston, TX 77553, USASchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USAThe evolution of a microcanonical statistical ensemble of states of isolated systems from order to disorder as determined by increasing entropy, is compared to an alternative evolution that is determined by mixing character. The fact that the partitions of an integer N are in one-to-one correspondence with macrostates for N distinguishable objects is noted. Orders for integer partitions are given, including the original order by Young and the Boltzmann order by entropy. Mixing character (represented by Young diagrams) is seen to be a partially ordered quality rather than a quantity (See Ruch, 1975). The majorization partial order is reviewed as is its Hasse diagram representation known as the Young Diagram Lattice (YDL).Two lattices that show allowed transitions between macrostates are obtained from the YDL: we term these the mixing lattice and the diversity lattice. We study the dynamics (time evolution) on the two lattices, namely the sequence of steps on the lattices (i.e., the path or trajectory) that leads from low entropy, less mixed states to high entropy, highly mixed states. These paths are sequences of macrostates with monotonically increasing entropy. The distributions of path lengths on the two lattices are obtained via Monte Carlo methods, and surprisingly both distributions appear Gaussian. However, the width of the path length distribution for diversity is the square root of the mixing case, suggesting a qualitative difference in their temporal evolution. Another surprising result is that some macrostates occur in many paths while others do not. The evolution at low entropy and at high entropy is quite simple, but at intermediate entropies, the number of possible evolutionary paths is extremely large (due to the extensive branching of the lattices). A quantitative complexity measure associated with incomparability of macrostates in the mixing partial order is proposed, complementing Kolmogorov complexity and Shannon entropy.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/16/7/3793mixingmajorizationcomplexity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William Seitz
A. D. Kirwan
spellingShingle William Seitz
A. D. Kirwan
Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
Entropy
mixing
majorization
complexity
author_facet William Seitz
A. D. Kirwan
author_sort William Seitz
title Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
title_short Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
title_full Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
title_fullStr Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
title_full_unstemmed Entropy vs. Majorization: What Determines Complexity?
title_sort entropy vs. majorization: what determines complexity?
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2014-07-01
description The evolution of a microcanonical statistical ensemble of states of isolated systems from order to disorder as determined by increasing entropy, is compared to an alternative evolution that is determined by mixing character. The fact that the partitions of an integer N are in one-to-one correspondence with macrostates for N distinguishable objects is noted. Orders for integer partitions are given, including the original order by Young and the Boltzmann order by entropy. Mixing character (represented by Young diagrams) is seen to be a partially ordered quality rather than a quantity (See Ruch, 1975). The majorization partial order is reviewed as is its Hasse diagram representation known as the Young Diagram Lattice (YDL).Two lattices that show allowed transitions between macrostates are obtained from the YDL: we term these the mixing lattice and the diversity lattice. We study the dynamics (time evolution) on the two lattices, namely the sequence of steps on the lattices (i.e., the path or trajectory) that leads from low entropy, less mixed states to high entropy, highly mixed states. These paths are sequences of macrostates with monotonically increasing entropy. The distributions of path lengths on the two lattices are obtained via Monte Carlo methods, and surprisingly both distributions appear Gaussian. However, the width of the path length distribution for diversity is the square root of the mixing case, suggesting a qualitative difference in their temporal evolution. Another surprising result is that some macrostates occur in many paths while others do not. The evolution at low entropy and at high entropy is quite simple, but at intermediate entropies, the number of possible evolutionary paths is extremely large (due to the extensive branching of the lattices). A quantitative complexity measure associated with incomparability of macrostates in the mixing partial order is proposed, complementing Kolmogorov complexity and Shannon entropy.
topic mixing
majorization
complexity
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/16/7/3793
work_keys_str_mv AT williamseitz entropyvsmajorizationwhatdeterminescomplexity
AT adkirwan entropyvsmajorizationwhatdeterminescomplexity
_version_ 1725484685345161216