Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
Abstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. U...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Computational Social Networks |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3 |
id |
doaj-a0125a0b1ac04e1897b18d063a53a419 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0125a0b1ac04e1897b18d063a53a4192021-04-02T10:07:18ZengSpringerOpenComputational Social Networks2197-43142017-05-014113510.1186/s40649-017-0037-3Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seedingYijin Wei0Gwen Spencer1Center for Computational Engineering, MITMathematics and Statistics, Smith CollegeAbstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. Unfortunately, social network links are rarely known in an exact way. When do seeding strategies based on less-than-accurate link prediction provide valuable insight? Our contribution We introduce optimized-against-a-sample ( $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS ) performance to measure the value of optimizing seeding based on a noisy observation of a network. Our computational study investigates $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS under several threshold-spread models in synthetic and real-world networks. Our focus is on measuring the value of imprecise link information. The level of investment in link prediction that is strategic appears to depend closely on spread model: in some parameter ranges investments in improving link prediction can pay substantial premiums in cascade size. For other ranges, such investments would be wasted. Several trends were remarkably consistent across topologies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3Influence maximizationLink predictionThreshold spreadNetwork seedingOptimization under uncertainty |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yijin Wei Gwen Spencer |
spellingShingle |
Yijin Wei Gwen Spencer Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding Computational Social Networks Influence maximization Link prediction Threshold spread Network seeding Optimization under uncertainty |
author_facet |
Yijin Wei Gwen Spencer |
author_sort |
Yijin Wei |
title |
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
title_short |
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
title_full |
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
title_fullStr |
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
title_sort |
measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Computational Social Networks |
issn |
2197-4314 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. Unfortunately, social network links are rarely known in an exact way. When do seeding strategies based on less-than-accurate link prediction provide valuable insight? Our contribution We introduce optimized-against-a-sample ( $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS ) performance to measure the value of optimizing seeding based on a noisy observation of a network. Our computational study investigates $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS under several threshold-spread models in synthetic and real-world networks. Our focus is on measuring the value of imprecise link information. The level of investment in link prediction that is strategic appears to depend closely on spread model: in some parameter ranges investments in improving link prediction can pay substantial premiums in cascade size. For other ranges, such investments would be wasted. Several trends were remarkably consistent across topologies. |
topic |
Influence maximization Link prediction Threshold spread Network seeding Optimization under uncertainty |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yijinwei measuringthevalueofaccuratelinkpredictionfornetworkseeding AT gwenspencer measuringthevalueofaccuratelinkpredictionfornetworkseeding |
_version_ |
1724167977251635200 |