Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding

Abstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. U...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yijin Wei, Gwen Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-05-01
Series:Computational Social Networks
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3
id doaj-a0125a0b1ac04e1897b18d063a53a419
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0125a0b1ac04e1897b18d063a53a4192021-04-02T10:07:18ZengSpringerOpenComputational Social Networks2197-43142017-05-014113510.1186/s40649-017-0037-3Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seedingYijin Wei0Gwen Spencer1Center for Computational Engineering, MITMathematics and Statistics, Smith CollegeAbstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. Unfortunately, social network links are rarely known in an exact way. When do seeding strategies based on less-than-accurate link prediction provide valuable insight? Our contribution We introduce optimized-against-a-sample ( $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS ) performance to measure the value of optimizing seeding based on a noisy observation of a network. Our computational study investigates $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS under several threshold-spread models in synthetic and real-world networks. Our focus is on measuring the value of imprecise link information. The level of investment in link prediction that is strategic appears to depend closely on spread model: in some parameter ranges investments in improving link prediction can pay substantial premiums in cascade size. For other ranges, such investments would be wasted. Several trends were remarkably consistent across topologies.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3Influence maximizationLink predictionThreshold spreadNetwork seedingOptimization under uncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yijin Wei
Gwen Spencer
spellingShingle Yijin Wei
Gwen Spencer
Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
Computational Social Networks
Influence maximization
Link prediction
Threshold spread
Network seeding
Optimization under uncertainty
author_facet Yijin Wei
Gwen Spencer
author_sort Yijin Wei
title Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
title_short Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
title_full Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
title_fullStr Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
title_sort measuring the value of accurate link prediction for network seeding
publisher SpringerOpen
series Computational Social Networks
issn 2197-4314
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract Merging two classic questions The influence-maximization literature seeks small sets of individuals whose structural placement in the social network can drive large cascades of behavior. Optimization efforts to find the best seed set often assume perfect knowledge of the network topology. Unfortunately, social network links are rarely known in an exact way. When do seeding strategies based on less-than-accurate link prediction provide valuable insight? Our contribution We introduce optimized-against-a-sample ( $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS ) performance to measure the value of optimizing seeding based on a noisy observation of a network. Our computational study investigates $$\text{OAS}$$ OAS under several threshold-spread models in synthetic and real-world networks. Our focus is on measuring the value of imprecise link information. The level of investment in link prediction that is strategic appears to depend closely on spread model: in some parameter ranges investments in improving link prediction can pay substantial premiums in cascade size. For other ranges, such investments would be wasted. Several trends were remarkably consistent across topologies.
topic Influence maximization
Link prediction
Threshold spread
Network seeding
Optimization under uncertainty
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40649-017-0037-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yijinwei measuringthevalueofaccuratelinkpredictionfornetworkseeding
AT gwenspencer measuringthevalueofaccuratelinkpredictionfornetworkseeding
_version_ 1724167977251635200