Committing to Data Quality Review

<!-- p.abstract-western { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 10pt; }p.abstract-cjk { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "DejaVu Sans","Arial",s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Limor Peer, Ann Green, Elizabeth Stephenson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2014-07-01
Series:International Journal of Digital Curation
Online Access:http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/317
id doaj-9fec76c30813419cb7dc4866d507898f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fec76c30813419cb7dc4866d507898f2020-11-24T23:37:15ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562014-07-019126329110.2218/ijdc.v9i1.317284Committing to Data Quality ReviewLimor PeerAnn GreenElizabeth Stephenson<!-- p.abstract-western { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 10pt; }p.abstract-cjk { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "DejaVu Sans","Arial",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; }p.abstract-ctl { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "Lohit Hindi","Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt; }p { text-indent: 0.64cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; direction: ltr; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); widows: 2; orphans: 2; }p.western { font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12pt; }p.cjk { font-family: "DejaVu Sans","Arial",sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; }p.ctl { font-family: "Lohit Hindi","Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt; }a.cjk:visited { }a:link { color: rgb(0, 107, 107); text-decoration: none; }a.western:link { }a.ctl:link { }a.sdfootnotesym-western { font-size: 7pt; }a.sdfootnotesym-cjk { font-size: 7pt; } --> <p class="abstract-western"><span style="color: #000000;">Amid the pressure and enthusiasm for researchers to share data, a rapidly growing number of tools and services have emerged. What do we know about the quality of these data? Why does quality matter? And who should be responsible for data quality? We believe an essential measure of data quality is the ability to engage in informed reuse, which requires that data are independently understandable</span><span style="color: #000000;">. In practice, this means that data must undergo quality review, a process whereby data and associated files are assessed and required actions are taken to ensure files are independently understandable for informed reuse. This paper explains what we mean by data quality review, what measures can be applied to it, and how it is practiced in three domain-specific archives. We explore a selection of other data repositories in the research data ecosystem, as well as the roles of researchers, academic libraries, and scholarly journals in regard to their application of data quality measures in practice. We end with thoughts about the need to commit to data quality and who might be able to take on those tasks.</span></p>http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/317
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Limor Peer
Ann Green
Elizabeth Stephenson
spellingShingle Limor Peer
Ann Green
Elizabeth Stephenson
Committing to Data Quality Review
International Journal of Digital Curation
author_facet Limor Peer
Ann Green
Elizabeth Stephenson
author_sort Limor Peer
title Committing to Data Quality Review
title_short Committing to Data Quality Review
title_full Committing to Data Quality Review
title_fullStr Committing to Data Quality Review
title_full_unstemmed Committing to Data Quality Review
title_sort committing to data quality review
publisher University of Edinburgh
series International Journal of Digital Curation
issn 1746-8256
publishDate 2014-07-01
description <!-- p.abstract-western { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 10pt; }p.abstract-cjk { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "DejaVu Sans","Arial",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; }p.abstract-ctl { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.18cm; font-family: "Lohit Hindi","Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt; }p { text-indent: 0.64cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; direction: ltr; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); widows: 2; orphans: 2; }p.western { font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12pt; }p.cjk { font-family: "DejaVu Sans","Arial",sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; }p.ctl { font-family: "Lohit Hindi","Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt; }a.cjk:visited { }a:link { color: rgb(0, 107, 107); text-decoration: none; }a.western:link { }a.ctl:link { }a.sdfootnotesym-western { font-size: 7pt; }a.sdfootnotesym-cjk { font-size: 7pt; } --> <p class="abstract-western"><span style="color: #000000;">Amid the pressure and enthusiasm for researchers to share data, a rapidly growing number of tools and services have emerged. What do we know about the quality of these data? Why does quality matter? And who should be responsible for data quality? We believe an essential measure of data quality is the ability to engage in informed reuse, which requires that data are independently understandable</span><span style="color: #000000;">. In practice, this means that data must undergo quality review, a process whereby data and associated files are assessed and required actions are taken to ensure files are independently understandable for informed reuse. This paper explains what we mean by data quality review, what measures can be applied to it, and how it is practiced in three domain-specific archives. We explore a selection of other data repositories in the research data ecosystem, as well as the roles of researchers, academic libraries, and scholarly journals in regard to their application of data quality measures in practice. We end with thoughts about the need to commit to data quality and who might be able to take on those tasks.</span></p>
url http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/317
work_keys_str_mv AT limorpeer committingtodataqualityreview
AT anngreen committingtodataqualityreview
AT elizabethstephenson committingtodataqualityreview
_version_ 1725520883185876992