Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan

Introduction: Although though the best way to assess individual’s oral hygiene is to measure plaque and calculus indices, various studies have evaluated an individual’s self-report of oral-hygiene behaviors. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic values of self-reporting tool and relati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Imaneh Asgari, Asma Amiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2019-09-01
Series:Caspian journal of dental research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cjdr.ir/article-1-282-en.html
id doaj-9fe70e718e2043078124735ab20087ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fe70e718e2043078124735ab20087ae2020-11-25T03:55:36ZengBabol University of Medical SciencesCaspian journal of dental research2251-98902322-23952019-09-01825662Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in IsfahanImaneh Asgari0Asma Amiri1 ,Dental Materials Research Center, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran. ,Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran. Introduction: Although though the best way to assess individual’s oral hygiene is to measure plaque and calculus indices, various studies have evaluated an individual’s self-report of oral-hygiene behaviors. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic values of self-reporting tool and relationship between current oral self-care behaviors and plaque index (PI). Materials &Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 260 13-15-year-old students from girls’ schools in Isfahan using two-stage randomized sampling. Data collection tools on oral-hygiene habits were extracted based on available studies and presented in two versions for student and parent. Then, students’ PI was measured by a trained and calibrated examiner using Silness and Loe PI. The frequency of oral-hygiene behaviors reported by parents and students with PI was measured by McNemar, Kappa and Mann Whitney tests with significance level of 0.05. Sensitivity and specificity of the tools were calculated based on the standard PI. Results: The PI mean (SD) was 1.07 ±0.5. There was a significant relationship between PI and self-reported toothbrushing status (p = 0.017). The PI was higher in students with bad toothbrushing habits based on the reports of themselves and their parents as well as with bad flossing habits based on their parents’ reports (p=0.017, 0.001, 0.005). Diagnostic value of children’s self-report and parental report about toothbrushing status indicated low sensitivity (about 35%) and high specificity (about 83%). Positive predictive value was approximately good (about 71%) and negative predictive value was low (about 52%). Diagnostic value of parental report about flossing status represented high sensitivity (85%) and low specificity (26%). Conclusion: Findings of this study suggested that among such population, students with bad toothbrushing habits based on parental and self-reports are more likely to have undesirable (moderate/poor) PI.http://cjdr.ir/article-1-282-en.htmltoothbrushingsensitivity and specificityoral hygienedental plaque indexself- report
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Imaneh Asgari
Asma Amiri
spellingShingle Imaneh Asgari
Asma Amiri
Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
Caspian journal of dental research
toothbrushing
sensitivity and specificity
oral hygiene
dental plaque index
self- report
author_facet Imaneh Asgari
Asma Amiri
author_sort Imaneh Asgari
title Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
title_short Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
title_full Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
title_fullStr Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in Isfahan
title_sort relationship between self-reported oral hygiene and clinical plaque index among adolescents in isfahan
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
series Caspian journal of dental research
issn 2251-9890
2322-2395
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Introduction: Although though the best way to assess individual’s oral hygiene is to measure plaque and calculus indices, various studies have evaluated an individual’s self-report of oral-hygiene behaviors. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic values of self-reporting tool and relationship between current oral self-care behaviors and plaque index (PI). Materials &Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 260 13-15-year-old students from girls’ schools in Isfahan using two-stage randomized sampling. Data collection tools on oral-hygiene habits were extracted based on available studies and presented in two versions for student and parent. Then, students’ PI was measured by a trained and calibrated examiner using Silness and Loe PI. The frequency of oral-hygiene behaviors reported by parents and students with PI was measured by McNemar, Kappa and Mann Whitney tests with significance level of 0.05. Sensitivity and specificity of the tools were calculated based on the standard PI. Results: The PI mean (SD) was 1.07 ±0.5. There was a significant relationship between PI and self-reported toothbrushing status (p = 0.017). The PI was higher in students with bad toothbrushing habits based on the reports of themselves and their parents as well as with bad flossing habits based on their parents’ reports (p=0.017, 0.001, 0.005). Diagnostic value of children’s self-report and parental report about toothbrushing status indicated low sensitivity (about 35%) and high specificity (about 83%). Positive predictive value was approximately good (about 71%) and negative predictive value was low (about 52%). Diagnostic value of parental report about flossing status represented high sensitivity (85%) and low specificity (26%). Conclusion: Findings of this study suggested that among such population, students with bad toothbrushing habits based on parental and self-reports are more likely to have undesirable (moderate/poor) PI.
topic toothbrushing
sensitivity and specificity
oral hygiene
dental plaque index
self- report
url http://cjdr.ir/article-1-282-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT imanehasgari relationshipbetweenselfreportedoralhygieneandclinicalplaqueindexamongadolescentsinisfahan
AT asmaamiri relationshipbetweenselfreportedoralhygieneandclinicalplaqueindexamongadolescentsinisfahan
_version_ 1724469255654604800