Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics
The quantification theory of propositions in Russell’s Principles of Mathematics has been the subject of an intensive study and in reconstruction has been found to be complete with respect to analogs of the truths of modern quantification theory. A difficulty arises in the reconstruction, however,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MULPress
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
Online Access: | https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4176 |
id |
doaj-9fe0059924b7427b9f9d29b5e5568071 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9fe0059924b7427b9f9d29b5e55680712020-11-25T04:10:32ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032020-09-018810.15173/jhap.v8i8.4176Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of MathematicsGregory Landini0University of Iowa The quantification theory of propositions in Russell’s Principles of Mathematics has been the subject of an intensive study and in reconstruction has been found to be complete with respect to analogs of the truths of modern quantification theory. A difficulty arises in the reconstruction, however, because it presents universally quantified exportations of five of Russell’s axioms. This paper investigates whether a formal system can be found that is more faithful to Russell’s original prose. Russell offers axioms that are universally quantified implications that have antecedent clauses that are conjunctions. The presence of conjunctions as antecedent clauses seems to doom the theory from the onset, it will be found that there is no way to prove conjunctions so that, after universal instantiation, one can detach the needed antecedent clauses. Amalgamating two of Russell’s axioms, this paper overcomes the difficulty. https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4176 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gregory Landini |
spellingShingle |
Gregory Landini Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
author_facet |
Gregory Landini |
author_sort |
Gregory Landini |
title |
Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics |
title_short |
Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics |
title_full |
Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics |
title_fullStr |
Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solving the Conjunction Problem of Russell's Principles of Mathematics |
title_sort |
solving the conjunction problem of russell's principles of mathematics |
publisher |
MULPress |
series |
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
issn |
2159-0303 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
The quantification theory of propositions in Russell’s Principles of Mathematics has been the subject of an intensive study and in reconstruction has been found to be complete with respect to analogs of the truths of modern quantification theory. A difficulty arises in the reconstruction, however, because it presents universally quantified exportations of five of Russell’s axioms. This paper investigates whether a formal system can be found that is more faithful to Russell’s original prose. Russell offers axioms that are universally quantified implications that have antecedent clauses that are conjunctions. The presence of conjunctions as antecedent clauses seems to doom the theory from the onset, it will be found that there is no way to prove conjunctions so that, after universal instantiation, one can detach the needed antecedent clauses. Amalgamating two of Russell’s axioms, this paper overcomes the difficulty.
|
url |
https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4176 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gregorylandini solvingtheconjunctionproblemofrussellsprinciplesofmathematics |
_version_ |
1724420306831933440 |