Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?

The development of new communication technologies has led to a push for greater technology use for teaching and learning. This is most true for distance learning education, which relies heavily on new technologies. Distance learning students, however, seem to have very limited time available for stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emmanuelle Quillérou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athabasca University Press 2011-10-01
Series:International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/998/1968
id doaj-9fccf378fb504ddf8ed297adde1a7b3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fccf378fb504ddf8ed297adde1a7b3b2020-11-25T02:14:51ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1492-38312011-10-01126Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?Emmanuelle QuillérouThe development of new communication technologies has led to a push for greater technology use for teaching and learning. This is most true for distance learning education, which relies heavily on new technologies. Distance learning students, however, seem to have very limited time available for studying and learning because of work and/or family commitments. This paper focuses on the actual use by distance learning students of different teaching and learning resources and their associated teaching technologies (learning tools). The organisation of one module has been conceptualised as a toolbox, encompassing all the learning tools provided to students. This toolbox also explicitly includes an embedded priority system for the examination of available learning resources, conceptualised as a traffic-light toolbox in this paper. Results from a survey on the resources actually used by students show that students are indeed time-constrained. Students consequently follow the priority system embedded into the module and do not use non-examinable resources much. This paper concludes that students’ specific needs or situations need to be considered for the design of an effective learning toolbox, as opposed to just providing a bundle of learning tools that may be effective on their own.http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/998/1968Distance learningtechnologyprioritiestime-constraintmodule organisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emmanuelle Quillérou
spellingShingle Emmanuelle Quillérou
Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Distance learning
technology
priorities
time-constraint
module organisation
author_facet Emmanuelle Quillérou
author_sort Emmanuelle Quillérou
title Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
title_short Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
title_full Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
title_fullStr Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
title_full_unstemmed Increased Technology Provision and Learning: Giving More for Nothing?
title_sort increased technology provision and learning: giving more for nothing?
publisher Athabasca University Press
series International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
issn 1492-3831
publishDate 2011-10-01
description The development of new communication technologies has led to a push for greater technology use for teaching and learning. This is most true for distance learning education, which relies heavily on new technologies. Distance learning students, however, seem to have very limited time available for studying and learning because of work and/or family commitments. This paper focuses on the actual use by distance learning students of different teaching and learning resources and their associated teaching technologies (learning tools). The organisation of one module has been conceptualised as a toolbox, encompassing all the learning tools provided to students. This toolbox also explicitly includes an embedded priority system for the examination of available learning resources, conceptualised as a traffic-light toolbox in this paper. Results from a survey on the resources actually used by students show that students are indeed time-constrained. Students consequently follow the priority system embedded into the module and do not use non-examinable resources much. This paper concludes that students’ specific needs or situations need to be considered for the design of an effective learning toolbox, as opposed to just providing a bundle of learning tools that may be effective on their own.
topic Distance learning
technology
priorities
time-constraint
module organisation
url http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/998/1968
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuellequillerou increasedtechnologyprovisionandlearninggivingmorefornothing
_version_ 1715535522187706368