“The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews

The anonymous peer review is an unpublished pre-publication review which evaluates research articles submitted to journals. This type of a review plays a special role in the genre landscape of Anglophone research by ensuring its appropriate quality and ethical standards. By performing this role, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yakhontova Tatyana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-12-01
Series:Topics in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0010
id doaj-9fc155cb524f4b77a8811cfc482e5ec3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fc155cb524f4b77a8811cfc482e5ec32021-09-05T21:24:14ZengSciendoTopics in Linguistics1337-75902199-65042019-12-01202678910.2478/topling-2019-0010topling-2019-0010“The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviewsYakhontova Tatyana0Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, UkraineThe anonymous peer review is an unpublished pre-publication review which evaluates research articles submitted to journals. This type of a review plays a special role in the genre landscape of Anglophone research by ensuring its appropriate quality and ethical standards. By performing this role, the peer review also realizes a didactic potential, as it motivates researchers to improve their investigations. This paper extends the existing research on the anonymous peer review and aims to deepen our understanding of this genre by analysing the overall functional organization of peer review texts and their prominent linguistic features shaped by three communicative functions ‒ “gatekeeping”, evaluative, and didactic. It also attempts to compare the characteristics of peer reviews in two research fields ideologically and epistemologically distant from each other ‒ applied linguistics and applied mathematics. The methodological framework of the study combines Swales’s move analysis and a functional stylistic perspective developed within the East European linguistic context. The analysis has revealed a three-move structure of review texts and disclosed the roles of interpersonal markers, evaluative lexis and four types of directives in the realization of the communicative functions of the genre. The typologies of reviewers’ comments and evaluative acts in reviews have also been suggested. Furthermore, the study has brought to light some quantitative and qualitative differences between the texts in two disciplines. It is anticipated that awareness of the linguistic conventions of anonymous peer reviews analysed in the paper will help researchers to perceive this genre as a valuable source of professional assistance and enlightenment.https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0010genreanonymous peer reviewcommunicative functionsmovesinterpersonal markersstylistic features evaluative lexisdirectives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yakhontova Tatyana
spellingShingle Yakhontova Tatyana
“The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
Topics in Linguistics
genre
anonymous peer review
communicative functions
moves
interpersonal markers
stylistic features evaluative lexis
directives
author_facet Yakhontova Tatyana
author_sort Yakhontova Tatyana
title “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
title_short “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
title_full “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
title_fullStr “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
title_full_unstemmed “The authors have wasted their time...”: Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
title_sort “the authors have wasted their time...”: genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews
publisher Sciendo
series Topics in Linguistics
issn 1337-7590
2199-6504
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The anonymous peer review is an unpublished pre-publication review which evaluates research articles submitted to journals. This type of a review plays a special role in the genre landscape of Anglophone research by ensuring its appropriate quality and ethical standards. By performing this role, the peer review also realizes a didactic potential, as it motivates researchers to improve their investigations. This paper extends the existing research on the anonymous peer review and aims to deepen our understanding of this genre by analysing the overall functional organization of peer review texts and their prominent linguistic features shaped by three communicative functions ‒ “gatekeeping”, evaluative, and didactic. It also attempts to compare the characteristics of peer reviews in two research fields ideologically and epistemologically distant from each other ‒ applied linguistics and applied mathematics. The methodological framework of the study combines Swales’s move analysis and a functional stylistic perspective developed within the East European linguistic context. The analysis has revealed a three-move structure of review texts and disclosed the roles of interpersonal markers, evaluative lexis and four types of directives in the realization of the communicative functions of the genre. The typologies of reviewers’ comments and evaluative acts in reviews have also been suggested. Furthermore, the study has brought to light some quantitative and qualitative differences between the texts in two disciplines. It is anticipated that awareness of the linguistic conventions of anonymous peer reviews analysed in the paper will help researchers to perceive this genre as a valuable source of professional assistance and enlightenment.
topic genre
anonymous peer review
communicative functions
moves
interpersonal markers
stylistic features evaluative lexis
directives
url https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT yakhontovatatyana theauthorshavewastedtheirtimegenrefeaturesandlanguageofanonymouspeerreviews
_version_ 1717780726801235968