Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars

<p>In situ observations of snowfall over the Antarctic Ice Sheet are scarce. Currently, continent-wide assessments of snowfall are limited to information from the Cloud Profiling Radar on board the CloudSat satellite, which has not been evaluated up to now. In this study, snowfall derived from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Souverijns, A. Gossart, S. Lhermitte, I. V. Gorodetskaya, J. Grazioli, A. Berne, C. Duran-Alarcon, B. Boudevillain, C. Genthon, C. Scarchilli, N. P. M. van Lipzig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-11-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3775/2018/tc-12-3775-2018.pdf
id doaj-9fb63e1da2a844d684e579c4ad20fcc6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fb63e1da2a844d684e579c4ad20fcc62020-11-24T20:42:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242018-11-01123775378910.5194/tc-12-3775-2018Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radarsN. Souverijns0A. Gossart1S. Lhermitte2I. V. Gorodetskaya3J. Grazioli4J. Grazioli5A. Berne6C. Duran-Alarcon7B. Boudevillain8C. Genthon9C. Scarchilli10N. P. M. van Lipzig11Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the NetherlandsCESAM – Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, PortugalEnvironmental Remote Sensing Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandFederal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Locarno-Monti, SwitzerlandEnvironmental Remote Sensing Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, FranceUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, FranceUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, FranceTechnical Unit for Energy and Environmental Modeling UTMEA, ENEA, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<p>In situ observations of snowfall over the Antarctic Ice Sheet are scarce. Currently, continent-wide assessments of snowfall are limited to information from the Cloud Profiling Radar on board the CloudSat satellite, which has not been evaluated up to now. In this study, snowfall derived from CloudSat is evaluated using three ground-based vertically profiling 24&thinsp;GHz precipitation radars (Micro Rain Radars: MRRs). Firstly, using the MRR long-term measurement records, an assessment of the uncertainty caused by the low temporal sampling rate of CloudSat (one revisit per 2.1 to 4.5 days) is performed. The 10–90th-percentile temporal sampling uncertainty in the snowfall climatology varies between 30&thinsp;% and 40&thinsp;% depending on the latitudinal location and revisit time of CloudSat. Secondly, an evaluation of the snowfall climatology indicates that the CloudSat product, derived at a resolution of 1<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> latitude by 2<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> longitude, is able to accurately represent the snowfall climatology at the three MRR sites (biases&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">&lt;</span>&thinsp;15&thinsp;%), outperforming ERA-Interim. For coarser and finer resolutions, the performance drops as a result of higher omission errors by CloudSat. Moreover, the CloudSat product does not perform well in simulating individual snowfall events. Since the difference between the MRRs and the CloudSat climatology are limited and the temporal uncertainty is lower than current Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) snowfall variability, our results imply that the CloudSat product is valuable for climate model evaluation purposes.</p>https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3775/2018/tc-12-3775-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Souverijns
A. Gossart
S. Lhermitte
I. V. Gorodetskaya
J. Grazioli
J. Grazioli
A. Berne
C. Duran-Alarcon
B. Boudevillain
C. Genthon
C. Scarchilli
N. P. M. van Lipzig
spellingShingle N. Souverijns
A. Gossart
S. Lhermitte
I. V. Gorodetskaya
J. Grazioli
J. Grazioli
A. Berne
C. Duran-Alarcon
B. Boudevillain
C. Genthon
C. Scarchilli
N. P. M. van Lipzig
Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
The Cryosphere
author_facet N. Souverijns
A. Gossart
S. Lhermitte
I. V. Gorodetskaya
J. Grazioli
J. Grazioli
A. Berne
C. Duran-Alarcon
B. Boudevillain
C. Genthon
C. Scarchilli
N. P. M. van Lipzig
author_sort N. Souverijns
title Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
title_short Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
title_full Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
title_fullStr Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
title_sort evaluation of the cloudsat surface snowfall product over antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The Cryosphere
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
publishDate 2018-11-01
description <p>In situ observations of snowfall over the Antarctic Ice Sheet are scarce. Currently, continent-wide assessments of snowfall are limited to information from the Cloud Profiling Radar on board the CloudSat satellite, which has not been evaluated up to now. In this study, snowfall derived from CloudSat is evaluated using three ground-based vertically profiling 24&thinsp;GHz precipitation radars (Micro Rain Radars: MRRs). Firstly, using the MRR long-term measurement records, an assessment of the uncertainty caused by the low temporal sampling rate of CloudSat (one revisit per 2.1 to 4.5 days) is performed. The 10–90th-percentile temporal sampling uncertainty in the snowfall climatology varies between 30&thinsp;% and 40&thinsp;% depending on the latitudinal location and revisit time of CloudSat. Secondly, an evaluation of the snowfall climatology indicates that the CloudSat product, derived at a resolution of 1<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> latitude by 2<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> longitude, is able to accurately represent the snowfall climatology at the three MRR sites (biases&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">&lt;</span>&thinsp;15&thinsp;%), outperforming ERA-Interim. For coarser and finer resolutions, the performance drops as a result of higher omission errors by CloudSat. Moreover, the CloudSat product does not perform well in simulating individual snowfall events. Since the difference between the MRRs and the CloudSat climatology are limited and the temporal uncertainty is lower than current Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) snowfall variability, our results imply that the CloudSat product is valuable for climate model evaluation purposes.</p>
url https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3775/2018/tc-12-3775-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nsouverijns evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT agossart evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT slhermitte evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT ivgorodetskaya evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT jgrazioli evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT jgrazioli evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT aberne evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT cduranalarcon evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT bboudevillain evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT cgenthon evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT cscarchilli evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
AT npmvanlipzig evaluationofthecloudsatsurfacesnowfallproductoverantarcticausinggroundbasedprecipitationradars
_version_ 1716822209508409344