Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]

The purpose of the editors is to take up again the most relevant papers from the conference, "The Nature of Gender—The Gender of Nature", held in Kiel (Germany) in November 2000. Various authors reflect on the current debate about the constructions and production of gender by referring to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dagmar Hoffmann, Sören Bott
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2004-01-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/641
id doaj-9fb2927b55cb4a1ca68543974bdd2d16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fb2927b55cb4a1ca68543974bdd2d162020-11-24T21:17:14ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272004-01-0151628Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]Dagmar Hoffmann0Sören Bott1Universität SiegenSenatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung BerlinThe purpose of the editors is to take up again the most relevant papers from the conference, "The Nature of Gender—The Gender of Nature", held in Kiel (Germany) in November 2000. Various authors reflect on the current debate about the constructions and production of gender by referring to the special debate in natural and technical sciences. The female contributors test and criticise popular explications for gender differences. Other authors try to analyse the particular reasons why women might or might not be interested in technology and why women study technology or natural science less often than men. The reader can select from many interesting and extraordinary perspectives from different disciplines. Perhaps some of the contributions could be helpful in underscoring similar approaches in social science. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0401314http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/641gender studiesgender identityrole takingwomen supportacceptance of technologycompetence
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dagmar Hoffmann
Sören Bott
spellingShingle Dagmar Hoffmann
Sören Bott
Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
gender studies
gender identity
role taking
women support
acceptance of technology
competence
author_facet Dagmar Hoffmann
Sören Bott
author_sort Dagmar Hoffmann
title Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
title_short Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
title_full Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
title_fullStr Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
title_full_unstemmed Review: Ursula Pasero & Anja Gottburgsen (Eds.) (2002). Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik [How Obvious is Sex? Gender and the Construction of Nature and Technology]
title_sort review: ursula pasero & anja gottburgsen (eds.) (2002). wie natürlich ist geschlecht? gender und die konstruktion von natur und technik [how obvious is sex? gender and the construction of nature and technology]
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The purpose of the editors is to take up again the most relevant papers from the conference, "The Nature of Gender—The Gender of Nature", held in Kiel (Germany) in November 2000. Various authors reflect on the current debate about the constructions and production of gender by referring to the special debate in natural and technical sciences. The female contributors test and criticise popular explications for gender differences. Other authors try to analyse the particular reasons why women might or might not be interested in technology and why women study technology or natural science less often than men. The reader can select from many interesting and extraordinary perspectives from different disciplines. Perhaps some of the contributions could be helpful in underscoring similar approaches in social science. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0401314
topic gender studies
gender identity
role taking
women support
acceptance of technology
competence
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/641
work_keys_str_mv AT dagmarhoffmann reviewursulapaseroanjagottburgseneds2002wienaturlichistgeschlechtgenderunddiekonstruktionvonnaturundtechnikhowobviousissexgenderandtheconstructionofnatureandtechnology
AT sorenbott reviewursulapaseroanjagottburgseneds2002wienaturlichistgeschlechtgenderunddiekonstruktionvonnaturundtechnikhowobviousissexgenderandtheconstructionofnatureandtechnology
_version_ 1726013434690011136