Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test (BC-GP) test to identify 12 Gram-positive bacterial gene targets and three genetic resistance determinants directly from positive blood cul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blake W Buchan, Christine C Ginocchio, Ryhana Manii, Robert Cavagnolo, Preeti Pancholi, Lettie Swyers, Richard B Thomson, Christopher Anderson, Karen Kaul, Nathan A Ledeboer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3699453?pdf=render
id doaj-9fafebf570f2457fbe47a50cc30dad26
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9fafebf570f2457fbe47a50cc30dad262020-11-25T02:43:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762013-01-01107e100147810.1371/journal.pmed.1001478Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.Blake W BuchanChristine C GinocchioRyhana ManiiRobert CavagnoloPreeti PancholiLettie SwyersRichard B ThomsonChristopher AndersonKaren KaulNathan A LedeboerBACKGROUND: A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test (BC-GP) test to identify 12 Gram-positive bacterial gene targets and three genetic resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths containing Gram-positive bacteria. METHODS AND FINDINGS: 1,252 blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria were prospectively collected and tested at five clinical centers between April, 2011 and January, 2012. An additional 387 contrived blood cultures containing uncommon targets (e.g., Listeria spp., S. lugdunensis, vanB-positive Enterococci) were included to fully evaluate the performance of the BC-GP test. Sensitivity and specificity for the 12 specific genus or species targets identified by the BC-GP test ranged from 92.6%-100% and 95.4%-100%, respectively. Identification of the mecA gene in 599 cultures containing S. aureus or S. epidermidis was 98.6% sensitive and 94.3% specific compared to cefoxitin disk method. Identification of the vanA gene in 81 cultures containing Enterococcus faecium or E. faecalis was 100% sensitive and specific. Approximately 7.5% (87/1,157) of single-organism cultures contained Gram-positive bacteria not present on the BC-GP test panel. In 95 cultures containing multiple organisms the BC-GP test was in 71.6% (68/95) agreement with culture results. Retrospective analysis of 107 separate blood cultures demonstrated that identification of methicillin resistant S. aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus spp. was completed an average of 41.8 to 42.4 h earlier using the BC-GP test compared to routine culture methods. The BC-GP test was unable to assign mecA to a specific organism in cultures containing more than one Staphylococcus isolate and does not identify common blood culture contaminants such as Micrococcus, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus. CONCLUSIONS: The BC-GP test is a multiplex test capable of detecting most leading causes of Gram-positive bacterial blood stream infections as well as genetic markers of methicillin and vancomycin resistance directly from positive blood cultures.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3699453?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blake W Buchan
Christine C Ginocchio
Ryhana Manii
Robert Cavagnolo
Preeti Pancholi
Lettie Swyers
Richard B Thomson
Christopher Anderson
Karen Kaul
Nathan A Ledeboer
spellingShingle Blake W Buchan
Christine C Ginocchio
Ryhana Manii
Robert Cavagnolo
Preeti Pancholi
Lettie Swyers
Richard B Thomson
Christopher Anderson
Karen Kaul
Nathan A Ledeboer
Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
PLoS Medicine
author_facet Blake W Buchan
Christine C Ginocchio
Ryhana Manii
Robert Cavagnolo
Preeti Pancholi
Lettie Swyers
Richard B Thomson
Christopher Anderson
Karen Kaul
Nathan A Ledeboer
author_sort Blake W Buchan
title Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
title_short Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
title_full Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
title_fullStr Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
title_full_unstemmed Multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
title_sort multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Medicine
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test (BC-GP) test to identify 12 Gram-positive bacterial gene targets and three genetic resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths containing Gram-positive bacteria. METHODS AND FINDINGS: 1,252 blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria were prospectively collected and tested at five clinical centers between April, 2011 and January, 2012. An additional 387 contrived blood cultures containing uncommon targets (e.g., Listeria spp., S. lugdunensis, vanB-positive Enterococci) were included to fully evaluate the performance of the BC-GP test. Sensitivity and specificity for the 12 specific genus or species targets identified by the BC-GP test ranged from 92.6%-100% and 95.4%-100%, respectively. Identification of the mecA gene in 599 cultures containing S. aureus or S. epidermidis was 98.6% sensitive and 94.3% specific compared to cefoxitin disk method. Identification of the vanA gene in 81 cultures containing Enterococcus faecium or E. faecalis was 100% sensitive and specific. Approximately 7.5% (87/1,157) of single-organism cultures contained Gram-positive bacteria not present on the BC-GP test panel. In 95 cultures containing multiple organisms the BC-GP test was in 71.6% (68/95) agreement with culture results. Retrospective analysis of 107 separate blood cultures demonstrated that identification of methicillin resistant S. aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus spp. was completed an average of 41.8 to 42.4 h earlier using the BC-GP test compared to routine culture methods. The BC-GP test was unable to assign mecA to a specific organism in cultures containing more than one Staphylococcus isolate and does not identify common blood culture contaminants such as Micrococcus, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus. CONCLUSIONS: The BC-GP test is a multiplex test capable of detecting most leading causes of Gram-positive bacterial blood stream infections as well as genetic markers of methicillin and vancomycin resistance directly from positive blood cultures.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3699453?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT blakewbuchan multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT christinecginocchio multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT ryhanamanii multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT robertcavagnolo multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT preetipancholi multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT lettieswyers multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT richardbthomson multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT christopheranderson multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT karenkaul multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
AT nathanaledeboer multiplexidentificationofgrampositivebacteriaandresistancedeterminantsdirectlyfrompositivebloodculturebrothsevaluationofanautomatedmicroarraybasednucleicacidtest
_version_ 1724770652184903680