Two conceptions of language: Wittgenstein and Chomsky on recursion as a “good” explanation of human nature
My major aim in this paper is to discuss whether the property of recursion provides a good explanation of human specificity. In so doing, I will analyze two approaches to the study of natural language: the computational and the anthropological conceptions. The main conclusion of this work is twofold...
Main Author: | Sergio Mota |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidad del Valle
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Praxis Filosófica |
Online Access: | http://praxis.univalle.edu.co/index.php/praxis/article/view/6154 |
Similar Items
-
Chomsky and Wittgenstein on Linguistic Competence
by: Thomas McNally, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
Wittgenstein vs. Chomsky: recortando distancias
by: Juan José Acero Fernández
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Noam Chomsky: language and nature
by: Santiago Roncagliolo
Published: (1997-06-01) -
The concept of human nature in Noam Chomsky = O conceito de natureza humana em Noam Chomsky
by: Madarasz, Norman Roland
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Chomsky with Lewis: Human Nature, Science and Language Origin
by: Marciano Escutia
Published: (2019-05-01)