Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?

Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in haemodialysis patients causes a great deal of controversy. This is because a number of pro- and anticoagulant factors play an important role in end-stage renal failure due to the nature of the disease itself. In these conditions, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacody...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marek Saracyn, Dorota Brodowska-Kania, Stanisław Niemczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/170576
id doaj-9f9223c888424fd3a0a6c68ef064e0d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f9223c888424fd3a0a6c68ef064e0d92020-11-25T00:49:55ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/170576170576Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?Marek Saracyn0Dorota Brodowska-Kania1Stanisław Niemczyk2Department of Internal Diseases, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Internal Diseases, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Internal Diseases, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Institute of Medicine, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141 Warsaw, PolandOral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in haemodialysis patients causes a great deal of controversy. This is because a number of pro- and anticoagulant factors play an important role in end-stage renal failure due to the nature of the disease itself. In these conditions, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the OACs used change as well. In the case of the treatment of venous thromboembolism, the only remaining option is OAC treatment according to regimens used for the general population. Prevention of HD vascular access thrombosis with the use of OACs is not very effective and can be dangerous. However, OAC treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation in dialysis population may be associated with an increase in the incidence of stroke and mortality. Doubts should be dispelled by prospective, randomised studies; at the moment, there is no justification for routine use of OACs in the above-mentioned indications. In selected cases of OAC therapy in this group of patients, it is absolutely necessary to control and monitor the applied treatment thoroughly. Indications for the use of OACs in patients with end-stage renal disease, including haemodialysis patients, should be currently limited.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/170576
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marek Saracyn
Dorota Brodowska-Kania
Stanisław Niemczyk
spellingShingle Marek Saracyn
Dorota Brodowska-Kania
Stanisław Niemczyk
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Marek Saracyn
Dorota Brodowska-Kania
Stanisław Niemczyk
author_sort Marek Saracyn
title Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
title_short Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
title_full Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
title_fullStr Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
title_full_unstemmed Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis: Is It Time to Abandon It?
title_sort oral anticoagulant therapy in patients receiving haemodialysis: is it time to abandon it?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in haemodialysis patients causes a great deal of controversy. This is because a number of pro- and anticoagulant factors play an important role in end-stage renal failure due to the nature of the disease itself. In these conditions, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the OACs used change as well. In the case of the treatment of venous thromboembolism, the only remaining option is OAC treatment according to regimens used for the general population. Prevention of HD vascular access thrombosis with the use of OACs is not very effective and can be dangerous. However, OAC treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation in dialysis population may be associated with an increase in the incidence of stroke and mortality. Doubts should be dispelled by prospective, randomised studies; at the moment, there is no justification for routine use of OACs in the above-mentioned indications. In selected cases of OAC therapy in this group of patients, it is absolutely necessary to control and monitor the applied treatment thoroughly. Indications for the use of OACs in patients with end-stage renal disease, including haemodialysis patients, should be currently limited.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/170576
work_keys_str_mv AT mareksaracyn oralanticoagulanttherapyinpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisisittimetoabandonit
AT dorotabrodowskakania oralanticoagulanttherapyinpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisisittimetoabandonit
AT stanisławniemczyk oralanticoagulanttherapyinpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisisittimetoabandonit
_version_ 1725250386428690432