A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA

This study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Sullivan, Andrew McConney, Laura B. Perry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-10-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791
id doaj-9f84c9d419fd4c2c9fda31edcc09c891
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f84c9d419fd4c2c9fda31edcc09c8912020-11-25T03:41:16ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402018-10-01810.1177/2158244018805791A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISAKevin Sullivan0Andrew McConney1Laura B. Perry2Murdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaMurdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaMurdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaThis study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning environments are less positive in rural communities than in urban. Furthermore, rural disadvantage in educational outcomes (reading) and opportunities is greater in Australia than Canada or New Zealand. This could be seen as surprising as student socioeconomic status (SES), typically a strong predictor of educational outcomes, is similar for rural communities in Australia and Canada, but lower in New Zealand. Rural school principals in Australia are most likely among the three countries to report that shortages of teaching personnel hinder learning. This could suggest that policies and structures can play a role in ameliorating or exacerbating rural educational disadvantage. We conclude with questions and recommendations for future research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Sullivan
Andrew McConney
Laura B. Perry
spellingShingle Kevin Sullivan
Andrew McConney
Laura B. Perry
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
SAGE Open
author_facet Kevin Sullivan
Andrew McConney
Laura B. Perry
author_sort Kevin Sullivan
title A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
title_short A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
title_full A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
title_fullStr A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
title_sort comparison of rural educational disadvantage in australia, canada, and new zealand using oecd’s pisa
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning environments are less positive in rural communities than in urban. Furthermore, rural disadvantage in educational outcomes (reading) and opportunities is greater in Australia than Canada or New Zealand. This could be seen as surprising as student socioeconomic status (SES), typically a strong predictor of educational outcomes, is similar for rural communities in Australia and Canada, but lower in New Zealand. Rural school principals in Australia are most likely among the three countries to report that shortages of teaching personnel hinder learning. This could suggest that policies and structures can play a role in ameliorating or exacerbating rural educational disadvantage. We conclude with questions and recommendations for future research.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinsullivan acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
AT andrewmcconney acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
AT laurabperry acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
AT kevinsullivan comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
AT andrewmcconney comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
AT laurabperry comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa
_version_ 1724530738031755264