A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA
This study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning en...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-10-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791 |
id |
doaj-9f84c9d419fd4c2c9fda31edcc09c891 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9f84c9d419fd4c2c9fda31edcc09c8912020-11-25T03:41:16ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402018-10-01810.1177/2158244018805791A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISAKevin Sullivan0Andrew McConney1Laura B. Perry2Murdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaMurdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaMurdoch University, Western Australia, AustraliaThis study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning environments are less positive in rural communities than in urban. Furthermore, rural disadvantage in educational outcomes (reading) and opportunities is greater in Australia than Canada or New Zealand. This could be seen as surprising as student socioeconomic status (SES), typically a strong predictor of educational outcomes, is similar for rural communities in Australia and Canada, but lower in New Zealand. Rural school principals in Australia are most likely among the three countries to report that shortages of teaching personnel hinder learning. This could suggest that policies and structures can play a role in ameliorating or exacerbating rural educational disadvantage. We conclude with questions and recommendations for future research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kevin Sullivan Andrew McConney Laura B. Perry |
spellingShingle |
Kevin Sullivan Andrew McConney Laura B. Perry A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Kevin Sullivan Andrew McConney Laura B. Perry |
author_sort |
Kevin Sullivan |
title |
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA |
title_short |
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA |
title_full |
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA |
title_sort |
comparison of rural educational disadvantage in australia, canada, and new zealand using oecd’s pisa |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
This study compares rural educational disadvantage across Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Across the three countries, student reading literacy and school learning environments are less positive in rural communities than in urban. Furthermore, rural disadvantage in educational outcomes (reading) and opportunities is greater in Australia than Canada or New Zealand. This could be seen as surprising as student socioeconomic status (SES), typically a strong predictor of educational outcomes, is similar for rural communities in Australia and Canada, but lower in New Zealand. Rural school principals in Australia are most likely among the three countries to report that shortages of teaching personnel hinder learning. This could suggest that policies and structures can play a role in ameliorating or exacerbating rural educational disadvantage. We conclude with questions and recommendations for future research. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kevinsullivan acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa AT andrewmcconney acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa AT laurabperry acomparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa AT kevinsullivan comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa AT andrewmcconney comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa AT laurabperry comparisonofruraleducationaldisadvantageinaustraliacanadaandnewzealandusingoecdspisa |
_version_ |
1724530738031755264 |