Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants

Context: The decision for cosmetic surgery (CS) can be influenced by psychological issues. Self-efficacy (SE) is one of the psychological factors affecting this decision. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare SE between the CS applicants (study group) and nonapplicants (control group). Sett...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Soroush, Bahare Andayeshgar, Maryam Janatolmakan, Alireza Khatony
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=55;epage=59;aulast=Soroush
id doaj-9f7ccefac92a4683af05a9c4e6feecbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f7ccefac92a4683af05a9c4e6feecbc2020-11-25T02:18:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTurkish Journal of Plastic Surgery2528-86442020-01-01281555910.4103/tjps.tjps_34_19Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicantsAli SoroushBahare AndayeshgarMaryam JanatolmakanAlireza KhatonyContext: The decision for cosmetic surgery (CS) can be influenced by psychological issues. Self-efficacy (SE) is one of the psychological factors affecting this decision. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare SE between the CS applicants (study group) and nonapplicants (control group). Setting and Design: In this cross-sectional study, 65 samples were recruited for each of the study and control groups. Materials and Methods: The study group was selected from among the beauty centers and the control group was selected among the ordinary people who did not intend to do CS. Convenience sampling was used to select the samples of the study and control groups. The control was matched with the study group with respect to gender, age, marital status, occupation, and education. To measure SE, Sherer et al.'s General Self-Efficacy Scale was used. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS software using descriptive and inferential statistics (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test, one-way ANOVA, and independent t-test). Results: The average SE was significantly lower in the study group than the control group (P = 0.008). In the study group, there was a significant relationship between SE and education (P = 0.03). However, there was no significant relationship between SE and other demographic variables. Conclusions: The study group had lower SE than that of the control group. It seems that low SE can affect the decision to undergo CS. To avoid unnecessary cosmetic surgeries, the SE of applicants is suggested to be investigated before surgery.http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=55;epage=59;aulast=Soroushcomparecosmetic surgeryself-efficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Soroush
Bahare Andayeshgar
Maryam Janatolmakan
Alireza Khatony
spellingShingle Ali Soroush
Bahare Andayeshgar
Maryam Janatolmakan
Alireza Khatony
Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
compare
cosmetic surgery
self-efficacy
author_facet Ali Soroush
Bahare Andayeshgar
Maryam Janatolmakan
Alireza Khatony
author_sort Ali Soroush
title Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
title_short Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
title_full Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
title_fullStr Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
title_full_unstemmed Self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
title_sort self-efficacy in cosmetic surgery applicants compared to nonapplicants
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
issn 2528-8644
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Context: The decision for cosmetic surgery (CS) can be influenced by psychological issues. Self-efficacy (SE) is one of the psychological factors affecting this decision. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare SE between the CS applicants (study group) and nonapplicants (control group). Setting and Design: In this cross-sectional study, 65 samples were recruited for each of the study and control groups. Materials and Methods: The study group was selected from among the beauty centers and the control group was selected among the ordinary people who did not intend to do CS. Convenience sampling was used to select the samples of the study and control groups. The control was matched with the study group with respect to gender, age, marital status, occupation, and education. To measure SE, Sherer et al.'s General Self-Efficacy Scale was used. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS software using descriptive and inferential statistics (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U-test, one-way ANOVA, and independent t-test). Results: The average SE was significantly lower in the study group than the control group (P = 0.008). In the study group, there was a significant relationship between SE and education (P = 0.03). However, there was no significant relationship between SE and other demographic variables. Conclusions: The study group had lower SE than that of the control group. It seems that low SE can affect the decision to undergo CS. To avoid unnecessary cosmetic surgeries, the SE of applicants is suggested to be investigated before surgery.
topic compare
cosmetic surgery
self-efficacy
url http://www.turkjplastsurg.org/article.asp?issn=1300-6878;year=2020;volume=28;issue=1;spage=55;epage=59;aulast=Soroush
work_keys_str_mv AT alisoroush selfefficacyincosmeticsurgeryapplicantscomparedtononapplicants
AT bahareandayeshgar selfefficacyincosmeticsurgeryapplicantscomparedtononapplicants
AT maryamjanatolmakan selfefficacyincosmeticsurgeryapplicantscomparedtononapplicants
AT alirezakhatony selfefficacyincosmeticsurgeryapplicantscomparedtononapplicants
_version_ 1724880955042168832