Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising

A previous article investigated Ricoeur’s stance on myth and demythologising. The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger. This study is a follow-up and proposes a way in which Ricoeur and Bultmann’s v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gert Malan
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2016-07-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/3216
id doaj-9f6f18bfe300403f88a7350ae1b18ab8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f6f18bfe300403f88a7350ae1b18ab82020-11-24T23:24:07ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502016-07-01723e1e610.4102/hts.v72i3.32162938Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologisingGert Malan0Department of New Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria, PretoriaA previous article investigated Ricoeur’s stance on myth and demythologising. The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger. This study is a follow-up and proposes a way in which Ricoeur and Bultmann’s views on myth and demythologisation can be merged in order to gain a broader approach to the understanding of myth and the concept of demythologising. As Ricoeur’s understanding of myth was influenced by literary criticism, Bultmann’s definition of myth is viewed through the lens of literary criticism, before turning to a comparison with Ricoeur’s views. A comparison of their ideas on demythologisation follows. Sociology of knowledge forms the last lens through which a possible merger of their approaches is contemplated. Keywords: myth; demythologisation; Ricoeur; Bultmann; simbolic universehttps://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/3216mythdemythologisationRicoeurBultmannsimbolic universe
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gert Malan
spellingShingle Gert Malan
Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
myth
demythologisation
Ricoeur
Bultmann
simbolic universe
author_facet Gert Malan
author_sort Gert Malan
title Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
title_short Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
title_full Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
title_fullStr Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
title_full_unstemmed Combining Ricoeur and Bultmann on myth and demythologising
title_sort combining ricoeur and bultmann on myth and demythologising
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2016-07-01
description A previous article investigated Ricoeur’s stance on myth and demythologising. The intersection of Ricoeur and Bultmann’s work in this field was noted and a future comparison was envisaged with a view to a possible merger. This study is a follow-up and proposes a way in which Ricoeur and Bultmann’s views on myth and demythologisation can be merged in order to gain a broader approach to the understanding of myth and the concept of demythologising. As Ricoeur’s understanding of myth was influenced by literary criticism, Bultmann’s definition of myth is viewed through the lens of literary criticism, before turning to a comparison with Ricoeur’s views. A comparison of their ideas on demythologisation follows. Sociology of knowledge forms the last lens through which a possible merger of their approaches is contemplated. Keywords: myth; demythologisation; Ricoeur; Bultmann; simbolic universe
topic myth
demythologisation
Ricoeur
Bultmann
simbolic universe
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/3216
work_keys_str_mv AT gertmalan combiningricoeurandbultmannonmythanddemythologising
_version_ 1725561625183780864