Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies

The academic discourse considers the regional scale as an important planning level to provide for spatial objectives that transcend the boundaries of local authorities. Nonetheless, the problem-solving capacity of the regional planning level is still questioned by both academics and practitioners. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. M. van Straalen, P. A. Witte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Regional Studies, Regional Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1455533
id doaj-9f6be2b11e124be5b2bef886d21725d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f6be2b11e124be5b2bef886d21725d82020-11-25T03:08:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRegional Studies, Regional Science2168-13762018-01-015115716310.1080/21681376.2018.14555331455533Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategiesF. M. van Straalen0P. A. Witte1Wageningen Universiteit en ResearchcentrumUtrecht UniversityThe academic discourse considers the regional scale as an important planning level to provide for spatial objectives that transcend the boundaries of local authorities. Nonetheless, the problem-solving capacity of the regional planning level is still questioned by both academics and practitioners. This paper studies the tension between formal and informal regional governance and its practical challenges for two cases of Dutch provinces struggling with their position in regional governance networks. These cases entail pan-European development (Trans-European Transport Networks – TEN-T) and regional land development (Bloemendalerpolder). It was found that at the metropolitan scale, formal regional planning powers tend to overrule socially produced regional governance arrangements. Simultaneously, regional planning powers lack support of these socially produced arrangements for their interventions. At the same time, at the supra-regional scale, provinces are a logical stakeholder to fulfil a prominent role in regional governance, but often lack the institutional capacity to act as such. We therefore argue that regional planning authorities need to be granted the power and capacity to take up a more centripetal, intermediate role in governance arrangements. This would provide them more capacity to act in disentangling the difficult practical challenges of scalar problems that many regional governance arrangements currently face.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1455533Regionalisationscalar problemsthe Netherlandsfuzzy governance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. M. van Straalen
P. A. Witte
spellingShingle F. M. van Straalen
P. A. Witte
Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
Regional Studies, Regional Science
Regionalisation
scalar problems
the Netherlands
fuzzy governance
author_facet F. M. van Straalen
P. A. Witte
author_sort F. M. van Straalen
title Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
title_short Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
title_full Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
title_fullStr Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
title_full_unstemmed Entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
title_sort entangled in scales: multilevel governance challenges for regional planning strategies
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Regional Studies, Regional Science
issn 2168-1376
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The academic discourse considers the regional scale as an important planning level to provide for spatial objectives that transcend the boundaries of local authorities. Nonetheless, the problem-solving capacity of the regional planning level is still questioned by both academics and practitioners. This paper studies the tension between formal and informal regional governance and its practical challenges for two cases of Dutch provinces struggling with their position in regional governance networks. These cases entail pan-European development (Trans-European Transport Networks – TEN-T) and regional land development (Bloemendalerpolder). It was found that at the metropolitan scale, formal regional planning powers tend to overrule socially produced regional governance arrangements. Simultaneously, regional planning powers lack support of these socially produced arrangements for their interventions. At the same time, at the supra-regional scale, provinces are a logical stakeholder to fulfil a prominent role in regional governance, but often lack the institutional capacity to act as such. We therefore argue that regional planning authorities need to be granted the power and capacity to take up a more centripetal, intermediate role in governance arrangements. This would provide them more capacity to act in disentangling the difficult practical challenges of scalar problems that many regional governance arrangements currently face.
topic Regionalisation
scalar problems
the Netherlands
fuzzy governance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1455533
work_keys_str_mv AT fmvanstraalen entangledinscalesmultilevelgovernancechallengesforregionalplanningstrategies
AT pawitte entangledinscalesmultilevelgovernancechallengesforregionalplanningstrategies
_version_ 1724664552546631680