Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)
COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we comp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2005-01-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | http://www.biogeosciences.net/2/125/2005/bg-2-125-2005.pdf |
id |
doaj-9f674afb9e904334b9ae404176deb234 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9f674afb9e904334b9ae404176deb2342020-11-24T22:50:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892005-01-0122125132Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)L. Sandoval-SotoM. StanimirovM. von HobeV. SchmittJ. ValdesA. WildJ. KesselmeierCOS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we compared experimentally derived and re-evaluated deposition velocities (<i>V<sub>d</sub></i>; related to stomatal conductance) for COS and CO<sub>2</sub>. We show that <i>V<sub>d</sub></i> of COS is generally significantly larger than that of CO<sub>2</sub>. We therefore introduced this attribute into a new global estimate of COS fluxes into vegetation. The new global estimate of the COS uptake based on available net primary productivity data (NPP) ranges between 0.69-1.40 Tga<sup>-1</sup>. However, as a COS molecule is irreversibly split in contrast to CO<sub>2</sub> which is released again by respiration processes, we took into account the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) representing the true CO<sub>2</sub> leaf flux the COS uptake has to be related to. Such a GPP based deposition estimate ranged between 1.4-–2.8 Tga<sup>-1</sup> (0.73-1.50 TgSa<sup>-1</sup>). We believe that in order to obtain accurate global COS sink estimates such a GPP-based estimate corrected by the different deposition velocities of COS and CO<sub>2</sub> must be taken into account.http://www.biogeosciences.net/2/125/2005/bg-2-125-2005.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
L. Sandoval-Soto M. Stanimirov M. von Hobe V. Schmitt J. Valdes A. Wild J. Kesselmeier |
spellingShingle |
L. Sandoval-Soto M. Stanimirov M. von Hobe V. Schmitt J. Valdes A. Wild J. Kesselmeier Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
L. Sandoval-Soto M. Stanimirov M. von Hobe V. Schmitt J. Valdes A. Wild J. Kesselmeier |
author_sort |
L. Sandoval-Soto |
title |
Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) |
title_short |
Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) |
title_full |
Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) |
title_fullStr |
Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) |
title_sort |
global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (cos) by terrestrial vegetation: estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (co<sub>2</sub>) |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2005-01-01 |
description |
COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we compared experimentally derived and re-evaluated deposition velocities (<i>V<sub>d</sub></i>; related to stomatal conductance) for COS and CO<sub>2</sub>. We show that <i>V<sub>d</sub></i> of COS is generally significantly larger than that of CO<sub>2</sub>. We therefore introduced this attribute into a new global estimate of COS fluxes into vegetation. The new global estimate of the COS uptake based on available net primary productivity data (NPP) ranges between 0.69-1.40 Tga<sup>-1</sup>. However, as a COS molecule is irreversibly split in contrast to CO<sub>2</sub> which is released again by respiration processes, we took into account the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) representing the true CO<sub>2</sub> leaf flux the COS uptake has to be related to. Such a GPP based deposition estimate ranged between 1.4-–2.8 Tga<sup>-1</sup> (0.73-1.50 TgSa<sup>-1</sup>). We believe that in order to obtain accurate global COS sink estimates such a GPP-based estimate corrected by the different deposition velocities of COS and CO<sub>2</sub> must be taken into account. |
url |
http://www.biogeosciences.net/2/125/2005/bg-2-125-2005.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lsandovalsoto globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT mstanimirov globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT mvonhobe globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT vschmitt globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT jvaldes globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT awild globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub AT jkesselmeier globaluptakeofcarbonylsulfidecosbyterrestrialvegetationestimatescorrectedbydepositionvelocitiesnormalizedtotheuptakeofcarbondioxidecosub2sub |
_version_ |
1725672591659630592 |