Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)

COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Sandoval-Soto, M. Stanimirov, M. von Hobe, V. Schmitt, J. Valdes, A. Wild, J. Kesselmeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/2/125/2005/bg-2-125-2005.pdf
Description
Summary:COS uptake by trees, as observed under dark/light changes and under application of the plant hormone abscisic acid, exhibited a strong correlation with the CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate and the stomatal conductance. As the uptake of COS occurred exclusively through the stomata we compared experimentally derived and re-evaluated deposition velocities (<i>V<sub>d</sub></i>; related to stomatal conductance) for COS and CO<sub>2</sub>. We show that <i>V<sub>d</sub></i> of COS is generally significantly larger than that of CO<sub>2</sub>. We therefore introduced this attribute into a new global estimate of COS fluxes into vegetation. The new global estimate of the COS uptake based on available net primary productivity data (NPP) ranges between 0.69-1.40 Tga<sup>-1</sup>. However, as a COS molecule is irreversibly split in contrast to CO<sub>2</sub> which is released again by respiration processes, we took into account the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) representing the true CO<sub>2</sub> leaf flux the COS uptake has to be related to. Such a GPP based deposition estimate ranged between 1.4-–2.8 Tga<sup>-1</sup> (0.73-1.50 TgSa<sup>-1</sup>). We believe that in order to obtain accurate global COS sink estimates such a GPP-based estimate corrected by the different deposition velocities of COS and CO<sub>2</sub> must be taken into account.
ISSN:1726-4170
1726-4189