The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.

Visual categorization appears both effortless and virtually instantaneous, the study by Thorpe et al. (1996) was the first to estimate the processing time necessary to perform fast visual categorization of animals in briefly flashed (20ms) natural photographs. They observed a large differential EEG...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michèle eFabre-Thorpe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00243/full
id doaj-9f5d547fee254ec895fb161d10ebe97e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f5d547fee254ec895fb161d10ebe97e2020-11-24T23:13:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-10-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.0024312324The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.Michèle eFabre-Thorpe0CNRSVisual categorization appears both effortless and virtually instantaneous, the study by Thorpe et al. (1996) was the first to estimate the processing time necessary to perform fast visual categorization of animals in briefly flashed (20ms) natural photographs. They observed a large differential EEG activity between target and distrater correct trials that developed from 150 ms after stimulus onset. A value that was later shown to be even shorter in monkeys! With such strong processing time constraints, it was difficult to escape the conclusion that rapid visual categorization was relying on massively parallel, essentially feed-forward processing of visual information.Since 1996, we have conducted a large number of studies to determine the characteristics and limits of fast visual categorization. The present chapter will review some of the main results obtained. I will argue that rapid object categorizations in natural scenes can be done without focused attention and are most likely based on coarse and unconscious visual representations activated with the first available (magnocellular) visual information.Fast visual processing proved efficient for the categorization of large superordinate object or scene categories, but shows its limits when more detailed basic representations are required. Basic objects (dogs, cars) or scenes (mountain or sea landscapes) representations need additionnal processing time to be activated. A finding that is at odds with the widely accepted idea that such basic representations are at the entry level of the system. Interestingly, focused attention is still not required to perform such, more time consuming, basic categorizations.Finally we will show that object and context processing can interact very early in an ascending wave of visual information processing. We will discuss how such data could result from our experience with a highly structured and predictable surrounding world that shaped neuronal visual selectivity.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00243/fullearly visual processingnatural scenesobjectsscenesrapid categorization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michèle eFabre-Thorpe
spellingShingle Michèle eFabre-Thorpe
The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
Frontiers in Psychology
early visual processing
natural scenes
objects
scenes
rapid categorization
author_facet Michèle eFabre-Thorpe
author_sort Michèle eFabre-Thorpe
title The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
title_short The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
title_full The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
title_fullStr The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
title_full_unstemmed The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
title_sort characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Visual categorization appears both effortless and virtually instantaneous, the study by Thorpe et al. (1996) was the first to estimate the processing time necessary to perform fast visual categorization of animals in briefly flashed (20ms) natural photographs. They observed a large differential EEG activity between target and distrater correct trials that developed from 150 ms after stimulus onset. A value that was later shown to be even shorter in monkeys! With such strong processing time constraints, it was difficult to escape the conclusion that rapid visual categorization was relying on massively parallel, essentially feed-forward processing of visual information.Since 1996, we have conducted a large number of studies to determine the characteristics and limits of fast visual categorization. The present chapter will review some of the main results obtained. I will argue that rapid object categorizations in natural scenes can be done without focused attention and are most likely based on coarse and unconscious visual representations activated with the first available (magnocellular) visual information.Fast visual processing proved efficient for the categorization of large superordinate object or scene categories, but shows its limits when more detailed basic representations are required. Basic objects (dogs, cars) or scenes (mountain or sea landscapes) representations need additionnal processing time to be activated. A finding that is at odds with the widely accepted idea that such basic representations are at the entry level of the system. Interestingly, focused attention is still not required to perform such, more time consuming, basic categorizations.Finally we will show that object and context processing can interact very early in an ascending wave of visual information processing. We will discuss how such data could result from our experience with a highly structured and predictable surrounding world that shaped neuronal visual selectivity.
topic early visual processing
natural scenes
objects
scenes
rapid categorization
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00243/full
work_keys_str_mv AT micheleefabrethorpe thecharacteristicsandlimitsofrapidvisualcategorization
AT micheleefabrethorpe characteristicsandlimitsofrapidvisualcategorization
_version_ 1725597371341996032