Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars

BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin-Uk Jang, Soo-Young Kim, Eul-Sik Yoon, Woo-Kyung Kim, Seung-Ha Park, Byung-Il Lee, Deok-Woo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2016-11-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdf
id doaj-9f5b5fe79e1b4882be6c2009a9a4e102
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f5b5fe79e1b4882be6c2009a9a4e1022020-11-24T21:30:53ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712016-11-0143657558110.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575740Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy ScarsJin-Uk Jang0Soo-Young Kim1Eul-Sik Yoon2Woo-Kyung Kim3Seung-Ha Park4Byung-Il Lee5Deok-Woo Kim6Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS).MethodsBetween February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale.ResultsThe mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred.ConclusionsBoth types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdfLaser therapyCicatrixThyroidectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jin-Uk Jang
Soo-Young Kim
Eul-Sik Yoon
Woo-Kyung Kim
Seung-Ha Park
Byung-Il Lee
Deok-Woo Kim
spellingShingle Jin-Uk Jang
Soo-Young Kim
Eul-Sik Yoon
Woo-Kyung Kim
Seung-Ha Park
Byung-Il Lee
Deok-Woo Kim
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Laser therapy
Cicatrix
Thyroidectomy
author_facet Jin-Uk Jang
Soo-Young Kim
Eul-Sik Yoon
Woo-Kyung Kim
Seung-Ha Park
Byung-Il Lee
Deok-Woo Kim
author_sort Jin-Uk Jang
title Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
title_short Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
title_full Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2016-11-01
description BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS).MethodsBetween February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale.ResultsThe mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred.ConclusionsBoth types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.
topic Laser therapy
Cicatrix
Thyroidectomy
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jinukjang comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT sooyoungkim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT eulsikyoon comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT wookyungkim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT seunghapark comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT byungillee comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
AT deokwookim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars
_version_ 1725961155049947136