Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional l...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Archives of Plastic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdf |
id |
doaj-9f5b5fe79e1b4882be6c2009a9a4e102 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9f5b5fe79e1b4882be6c2009a9a4e1022020-11-24T21:30:53ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712016-11-0143657558110.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575740Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy ScarsJin-Uk Jang0Soo-Young Kim1Eul-Sik Yoon2Woo-Kyung Kim3Seung-Ha Park4Byung-Il Lee5Deok-Woo Kim6Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS).MethodsBetween February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale.ResultsThe mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred.ConclusionsBoth types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdfLaser therapyCicatrixThyroidectomy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jin-Uk Jang Soo-Young Kim Eul-Sik Yoon Woo-Kyung Kim Seung-Ha Park Byung-Il Lee Deok-Woo Kim |
spellingShingle |
Jin-Uk Jang Soo-Young Kim Eul-Sik Yoon Woo-Kyung Kim Seung-Ha Park Byung-Il Lee Deok-Woo Kim Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars Archives of Plastic Surgery Laser therapy Cicatrix Thyroidectomy |
author_facet |
Jin-Uk Jang Soo-Young Kim Eul-Sik Yoon Woo-Kyung Kim Seung-Ha Park Byung-Il Lee Deok-Woo Kim |
author_sort |
Jin-Uk Jang |
title |
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_short |
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_full |
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_sort |
comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars |
publisher |
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons |
series |
Archives of Plastic Surgery |
issn |
2234-6163 2234-6171 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
BackgroundOpen thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS).MethodsBetween February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale.ResultsThe mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred.ConclusionsBoth types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics. |
topic |
Laser therapy Cicatrix Thyroidectomy |
url |
http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-575.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jinukjang comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT sooyoungkim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT eulsikyoon comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT wookyungkim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT seunghapark comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT byungillee comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT deokwookim comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars |
_version_ |
1725961155049947136 |