Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?

Urban commuting, a facet of transportation equity, is an important factor that shapes social equity. Little is known about how commuting practices shape individuals’ perceptions of social equity. To fill this gap, we conducted a multilevel regression using data from the China Labour-force...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyun Li, Hongsheng Chen, Yu Shi, Feng Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5884
id doaj-9f57c9a9feaa49ec96361ebe0596a37e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f57c9a9feaa49ec96361ebe0596a37e2020-11-24T21:24:07ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-10-011121588410.3390/su11215884su11215884Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?Xiaoyun Li0Hongsheng Chen1Yu Shi2Feng Shi3College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, ChinaSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, ChinaSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, ChinaSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, ChinaUrban commuting, a facet of transportation equity, is an important factor that shapes social equity. Little is known about how commuting practices shape individuals’ perceptions of social equity. To fill this gap, we conducted a multilevel regression using data from the China Labour-force Dynamics Survey 2016. We found that commuters who used private cars had the highest level of perceived social equity, while those who used bicycles had the lowest. Commuting time had a significant negative effect on respondents’ perceived social equity. This study verifies the “commuting paradox” to some extent, as income had no moderating effect on the relationship between commuting time and perceived social equity, which suggests that the social inequity caused by long commutes is not alleviated by higher wages. We also found that the perceived social equity of respondents who commuted on foot or by motorcycle was significantly negatively affected by commuting time. Based on our findings, we propose four ways to alleviate social inequity caused by commuting inequities: consider the commuting time sensitivity of different types of commuters, pay attention to the social equity issues caused by different transportation modes, provide more equitable commuting ways for low-income people, and prioritise public transportation.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5884commuting timesocial equitytransportation equitychinacommuting paradox
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoyun Li
Hongsheng Chen
Yu Shi
Feng Shi
spellingShingle Xiaoyun Li
Hongsheng Chen
Yu Shi
Feng Shi
Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
Sustainability
commuting time
social equity
transportation equity
china
commuting paradox
author_facet Xiaoyun Li
Hongsheng Chen
Yu Shi
Feng Shi
author_sort Xiaoyun Li
title Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
title_short Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
title_full Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
title_fullStr Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Transportation Equity in China: Does Commuting Time Matter?
title_sort transportation equity in china: does commuting time matter?
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Urban commuting, a facet of transportation equity, is an important factor that shapes social equity. Little is known about how commuting practices shape individuals’ perceptions of social equity. To fill this gap, we conducted a multilevel regression using data from the China Labour-force Dynamics Survey 2016. We found that commuters who used private cars had the highest level of perceived social equity, while those who used bicycles had the lowest. Commuting time had a significant negative effect on respondents’ perceived social equity. This study verifies the “commuting paradox” to some extent, as income had no moderating effect on the relationship between commuting time and perceived social equity, which suggests that the social inequity caused by long commutes is not alleviated by higher wages. We also found that the perceived social equity of respondents who commuted on foot or by motorcycle was significantly negatively affected by commuting time. Based on our findings, we propose four ways to alleviate social inequity caused by commuting inequities: consider the commuting time sensitivity of different types of commuters, pay attention to the social equity issues caused by different transportation modes, provide more equitable commuting ways for low-income people, and prioritise public transportation.
topic commuting time
social equity
transportation equity
china
commuting paradox
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5884
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyunli transportationequityinchinadoescommutingtimematter
AT hongshengchen transportationequityinchinadoescommutingtimematter
AT yushi transportationequityinchinadoescommutingtimematter
AT fengshi transportationequityinchinadoescommutingtimematter
_version_ 1725989565692379136