Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review

Objective : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. Methods : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cinthia de Oliveira LISBOA, Daniele MASTERSON, Andréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade MOTTA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2015-04-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572015000200002&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-9f55e9cb44c149fd9829a8423fea7184
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f55e9cb44c149fd9829a8423fea71842020-11-24T22:50:27ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77652015-04-0123211211910.1590/1678-775720140336S1678-77572015000200002Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic reviewCinthia de Oliveira LISBOADaniele MASTERSONAndréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTAAlexandre Trindade MOTTAObjective : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. Methods : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specific strategies were developed for each database, with the guidance of a librarian. Two reviewers independently analyzed the titles and abstracts for inclusion. The articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for full-text reading, and the selected articles went through methodological quality evaluation. After the exclusion of repeated articles, the titles of the remaining ones were read and 1,328 of them were excluded. The abstracts of 173 articles were read, of which 43 were selected, read in full and submitted to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles or studies with reliable methodology and reproducibility remained. The data were collected, organized into figures and analyzed for determination of the reliability and reproducibility of the three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks. Results : Overall, the landmarks on the median sagittal line and dental landmarks had the highest reliability, while the landmarks on the condyle, porion and the orbitale presented lower levels of reliability. Point S must be marked in the multiplanar views associated with visualization in 3D reconstruction. Further studies are necessary for evaluating soft tissue landmarks.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572015000200002&lng=en&tlng=enCone-beam computed tomographyReproducibility of resultsCephalometryThree-dimensional imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cinthia de Oliveira LISBOA
Daniele MASTERSON
Andréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTA
Alexandre Trindade MOTTA
spellingShingle Cinthia de Oliveira LISBOA
Daniele MASTERSON
Andréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTA
Alexandre Trindade MOTTA
Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Cone-beam computed tomography
Reproducibility of results
Cephalometry
Three-dimensional imaging
author_facet Cinthia de Oliveira LISBOA
Daniele MASTERSON
Andréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTA
Alexandre Trindade MOTTA
author_sort Cinthia de Oliveira LISBOA
title Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_short Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_full Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_sort reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using cbct: a systematic review
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7765
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Objective : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. Methods : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specific strategies were developed for each database, with the guidance of a librarian. Two reviewers independently analyzed the titles and abstracts for inclusion. The articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for full-text reading, and the selected articles went through methodological quality evaluation. After the exclusion of repeated articles, the titles of the remaining ones were read and 1,328 of them were excluded. The abstracts of 173 articles were read, of which 43 were selected, read in full and submitted to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles or studies with reliable methodology and reproducibility remained. The data were collected, organized into figures and analyzed for determination of the reliability and reproducibility of the three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks. Results : Overall, the landmarks on the median sagittal line and dental landmarks had the highest reliability, while the landmarks on the condyle, porion and the orbitale presented lower levels of reliability. Point S must be marked in the multiplanar views associated with visualization in 3D reconstruction. Further studies are necessary for evaluating soft tissue landmarks.
topic Cone-beam computed tomography
Reproducibility of results
Cephalometry
Three-dimensional imaging
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572015000200002&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT cinthiadeoliveiralisboa reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT danielemasterson reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT andreafonsecajardimmotta reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT alexandretrindademotta reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
_version_ 1725672476641329152