Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences

As concepts, communication and information are very closely related, but they also designate more than their usual conceptual meaning when they are called upon in social theories as well as in philosophical theories about the reality and the truth of social life; information and communication are th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean Robillard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op. 2006-01-01
Series:Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/15
id doaj-9f3f9771091042f1bf9d7fd60facda84
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f3f9771091042f1bf9d7fd60facda842020-11-24T20:42:44ZengCosmos and History Publishing Co-op.Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy1832-91012006-01-0112245260Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social SciencesJean RobillardAs concepts, communication and information are very closely related, but they also designate more than their usual conceptual meaning when they are called upon in social theories as well as in philosophical theories about the reality and the truth of social life; information and communication are then designating physical events or event like objects of the observable reality, which will be hereafter described as a procedural ontologization of information. Why do they have this role and how do they play it in contemporary social sciences and philosophy of social sciences? This article questions the scientificity of these concepts in these theoretical contexts. It wants to propose a framework for an epistemology of communication and information that is critical about the cybernetician paradigm in the social sciences. It presents this paradigm’s main features: informational ontology and probabilistic sociality. It offers a critique of this paradigm’s epistemological and methodological pretensions. It finally exposes the basis of an alternative philosophical theory of communication that wants to support the thesis that the cybernetician paradigmatic communication theory is not scientifically productive; and that it cannot be used in social scientific theoretical contexts without being dramatically redesigned and reoriented towards new goals. http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/15EpistemologyCommunicationInformationSocial ScienceOntology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean Robillard
spellingShingle Jean Robillard
Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Epistemology
Communication
Information
Social Science
Ontology
author_facet Jean Robillard
author_sort Jean Robillard
title Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
title_short Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
title_full Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
title_fullStr Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Philosophy of Communication: What Does it Have to do With Philosophy of Social Sciences
title_sort philosophy of communication: what does it have to do with philosophy of social sciences
publisher Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op.
series Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
issn 1832-9101
publishDate 2006-01-01
description As concepts, communication and information are very closely related, but they also designate more than their usual conceptual meaning when they are called upon in social theories as well as in philosophical theories about the reality and the truth of social life; information and communication are then designating physical events or event like objects of the observable reality, which will be hereafter described as a procedural ontologization of information. Why do they have this role and how do they play it in contemporary social sciences and philosophy of social sciences? This article questions the scientificity of these concepts in these theoretical contexts. It wants to propose a framework for an epistemology of communication and information that is critical about the cybernetician paradigm in the social sciences. It presents this paradigm’s main features: informational ontology and probabilistic sociality. It offers a critique of this paradigm’s epistemological and methodological pretensions. It finally exposes the basis of an alternative philosophical theory of communication that wants to support the thesis that the cybernetician paradigmatic communication theory is not scientifically productive; and that it cannot be used in social scientific theoretical contexts without being dramatically redesigned and reoriented towards new goals.
topic Epistemology
Communication
Information
Social Science
Ontology
url http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/15
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanrobillard philosophyofcommunicationwhatdoesithavetodowithphilosophyofsocialsciences
_version_ 1716821972471513088