Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden

Abstract Background The present study aimed to compare visual field progression in new-diagnosed exfoliation versus open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective study. The study included patients with new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma. All patients were followed for 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcelo Ayala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01592-w
id doaj-9f3e0c1369174f35a000c6396770c492
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f3e0c1369174f35a000c6396770c4922020-11-25T03:55:42ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152020-08-012011710.1186/s12886-020-01592-wComparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in SwedenMarcelo Ayala0Eye Department, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University & Karolinska InstituteAbstract Background The present study aimed to compare visual field progression in new-diagnosed exfoliation versus open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective study. The study included patients with new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma. All patients were followed for 3 years with reliable visual fields. At least five reliable fields were needed for inclusion. Exfoliation and open-angle glaucoma were defined based on the European Glaucoma Society guidelines. Visual field evaluation was performed using the software threshold 24–2 of the Humphrey Field Analysis. Outcomes: Visual field progression. For visual field progression, three different strategies were used: mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and the guided progression analysis (GPA). Results The study included 128 subjects, of the 54 in the open-angle and 74 in the exfoliation glaucoma group. The MD difference values were higher in the exfoliation (− 3.17 dB) than in the primary open-angle (− 1.25 dB) glaucoma group in the three-year follow-up period. The difference between groups was significant (t-test, p = < 0.001). The difference in VFI was calculated for the 3 years follow-up period. The difference was higher in the exfoliation (− 7.65%) than in the primary open (− 1.90%) glaucoma group (t-test, p = < 0.001). The GPA showed progression in 58% of cases in exfoliation, and 13% in primary open glaucoma group (Chi-square, p = < 0.001). Conclusion The present study found a more frequent and faster visual field progression in exfoliation than in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. New-diagnosed exfoliation glaucoma patients must be controlled and treated more strictly than primary open-angle glaucoma patients to avoid visual field deterioration.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01592-wExfoliation glaucomaVisual field progressionOpen-angle glaucomaSweden
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcelo Ayala
spellingShingle Marcelo Ayala
Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
BMC Ophthalmology
Exfoliation glaucoma
Visual field progression
Open-angle glaucoma
Sweden
author_facet Marcelo Ayala
author_sort Marcelo Ayala
title Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
title_short Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
title_full Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
title_fullStr Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden
title_sort comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in sweden
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background The present study aimed to compare visual field progression in new-diagnosed exfoliation versus open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods Retrospective study. The study included patients with new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma. All patients were followed for 3 years with reliable visual fields. At least five reliable fields were needed for inclusion. Exfoliation and open-angle glaucoma were defined based on the European Glaucoma Society guidelines. Visual field evaluation was performed using the software threshold 24–2 of the Humphrey Field Analysis. Outcomes: Visual field progression. For visual field progression, three different strategies were used: mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and the guided progression analysis (GPA). Results The study included 128 subjects, of the 54 in the open-angle and 74 in the exfoliation glaucoma group. The MD difference values were higher in the exfoliation (− 3.17 dB) than in the primary open-angle (− 1.25 dB) glaucoma group in the three-year follow-up period. The difference between groups was significant (t-test, p = < 0.001). The difference in VFI was calculated for the 3 years follow-up period. The difference was higher in the exfoliation (− 7.65%) than in the primary open (− 1.90%) glaucoma group (t-test, p = < 0.001). The GPA showed progression in 58% of cases in exfoliation, and 13% in primary open glaucoma group (Chi-square, p = < 0.001). Conclusion The present study found a more frequent and faster visual field progression in exfoliation than in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. New-diagnosed exfoliation glaucoma patients must be controlled and treated more strictly than primary open-angle glaucoma patients to avoid visual field deterioration.
topic Exfoliation glaucoma
Visual field progression
Open-angle glaucoma
Sweden
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01592-w
work_keys_str_mv AT marceloayala comparisonofvisualfieldprogressioninnewdiagnosedprimaryopenangleandexfoliationglaucomapatientsinsweden
_version_ 1724468693475262464