The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
Landscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017-09-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdf |
id |
doaj-9f2bd7b8a71b42f48b794d13c6c7d07c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9f2bd7b8a71b42f48b794d13c6c7d07c2020-11-24T21:02:55ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-09-015e377210.7717/peerj.3772The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misusesSonny S. Bleicher0Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of AmericaLandscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term, suggest boundaries and propose a common framework for its use. The LOF, as a progeny of the “ecology of fear” conceptual framework, defines fear as the strategic manifestation of the cost-benefit analysis of food and safety tradeoffs. In addition to direct predation risk, the LOF is affected by individuals’ energetic-state, inter- and intra-specific competition and is constrained by the evolutionary history of each species. Herein, based on current applications of the LOF conceptual framework, I suggest the future research in this framework will be directed towards: (1) finding applied management uses as a trait defining a population’s habitat-use and habitat-suitability; (2) studying multi-dimensional distribution of risk-assessment through time and space; (3) studying variability between individuals within a population; (4) measuring eco-neurological implications of risk as a feature of environmental heterogeneity and (5) expanding temporal and spatial scales of empirical studies.https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdfAnimal behaviorHabitat selectionYellowstoneGiving-up density (GUD)Spatial ecologyEvolutionary dynamics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sonny S. Bleicher |
spellingShingle |
Sonny S. Bleicher The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses PeerJ Animal behavior Habitat selection Yellowstone Giving-up density (GUD) Spatial ecology Evolutionary dynamics |
author_facet |
Sonny S. Bleicher |
author_sort |
Sonny S. Bleicher |
title |
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
title_short |
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
title_full |
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
title_fullStr |
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
title_full_unstemmed |
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
title_sort |
landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses |
publisher |
PeerJ Inc. |
series |
PeerJ |
issn |
2167-8359 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
Landscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term, suggest boundaries and propose a common framework for its use. The LOF, as a progeny of the “ecology of fear” conceptual framework, defines fear as the strategic manifestation of the cost-benefit analysis of food and safety tradeoffs. In addition to direct predation risk, the LOF is affected by individuals’ energetic-state, inter- and intra-specific competition and is constrained by the evolutionary history of each species. Herein, based on current applications of the LOF conceptual framework, I suggest the future research in this framework will be directed towards: (1) finding applied management uses as a trait defining a population’s habitat-use and habitat-suitability; (2) studying multi-dimensional distribution of risk-assessment through time and space; (3) studying variability between individuals within a population; (4) measuring eco-neurological implications of risk as a feature of environmental heterogeneity and (5) expanding temporal and spatial scales of empirical studies. |
topic |
Animal behavior Habitat selection Yellowstone Giving-up density (GUD) Spatial ecology Evolutionary dynamics |
url |
https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sonnysbleicher thelandscapeoffearconceptualframeworkdefinitionandreviewofcurrentapplicationsandmisuses AT sonnysbleicher landscapeoffearconceptualframeworkdefinitionandreviewofcurrentapplicationsandmisuses |
_version_ |
1716774911516606464 |