The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses

Landscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sonny S. Bleicher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-09-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdf
id doaj-9f2bd7b8a71b42f48b794d13c6c7d07c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f2bd7b8a71b42f48b794d13c6c7d07c2020-11-24T21:02:55ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-09-015e377210.7717/peerj.3772The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misusesSonny S. Bleicher0Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of AmericaLandscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term, suggest boundaries and propose a common framework for its use. The LOF, as a progeny of the “ecology of fear” conceptual framework, defines fear as the strategic manifestation of the cost-benefit analysis of food and safety tradeoffs. In addition to direct predation risk, the LOF is affected by individuals’ energetic-state, inter- and intra-specific competition and is constrained by the evolutionary history of each species. Herein, based on current applications of the LOF conceptual framework, I suggest the future research in this framework will be directed towards: (1) finding applied management uses as a trait defining a population’s habitat-use and habitat-suitability; (2) studying multi-dimensional distribution of risk-assessment through time and space; (3) studying variability between individuals within a population; (4) measuring eco-neurological implications of risk as a feature of environmental heterogeneity and (5) expanding temporal and spatial scales of empirical studies.https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdfAnimal behaviorHabitat selectionYellowstoneGiving-up density (GUD)Spatial ecologyEvolutionary dynamics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonny S. Bleicher
spellingShingle Sonny S. Bleicher
The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
PeerJ
Animal behavior
Habitat selection
Yellowstone
Giving-up density (GUD)
Spatial ecology
Evolutionary dynamics
author_facet Sonny S. Bleicher
author_sort Sonny S. Bleicher
title The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
title_short The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
title_full The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
title_fullStr The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
title_full_unstemmed The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
title_sort landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Landscapes of Fear (LOF), the spatially explicit distribution of perceived predation risk as seen by a population, is increasingly cited in ecological literature and has become a frequently used “buzz-word”. With the increase in popularity, it became necessary to clarify the definition for the term, suggest boundaries and propose a common framework for its use. The LOF, as a progeny of the “ecology of fear” conceptual framework, defines fear as the strategic manifestation of the cost-benefit analysis of food and safety tradeoffs. In addition to direct predation risk, the LOF is affected by individuals’ energetic-state, inter- and intra-specific competition and is constrained by the evolutionary history of each species. Herein, based on current applications of the LOF conceptual framework, I suggest the future research in this framework will be directed towards: (1) finding applied management uses as a trait defining a population’s habitat-use and habitat-suitability; (2) studying multi-dimensional distribution of risk-assessment through time and space; (3) studying variability between individuals within a population; (4) measuring eco-neurological implications of risk as a feature of environmental heterogeneity and (5) expanding temporal and spatial scales of empirical studies.
topic Animal behavior
Habitat selection
Yellowstone
Giving-up density (GUD)
Spatial ecology
Evolutionary dynamics
url https://peerj.com/articles/3772.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sonnysbleicher thelandscapeoffearconceptualframeworkdefinitionandreviewofcurrentapplicationsandmisuses
AT sonnysbleicher landscapeoffearconceptualframeworkdefinitionandreviewofcurrentapplicationsandmisuses
_version_ 1716774911516606464