Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hip arthroscopies are often used in the treatment of intra-articular hip injuries. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are an important parameter in evaluating treatment. It is unclear which PRO questionnaires are specifically available...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Cingel Robert, Tijssen Marsha, van Melick Nicky, de Visser Enrico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/117
id doaj-9f2875c3e9334aeab4eb84c6c621617b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9f2875c3e9334aeab4eb84c6c621617b2020-11-24T22:56:22ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742011-05-0112111710.1186/1471-2474-12-117Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidencevan Cingel RobertTijssen Marshavan Melick Nickyde Visser Enrico<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hip arthroscopies are often used in the treatment of intra-articular hip injuries. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are an important parameter in evaluating treatment. It is unclear which PRO questionnaires are specifically available for hip arthroscopy patients. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate which PRO questionnaires are valid and reliable in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A search was conducted in Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Pedro, EMBASE and Web of Science from 1931 to October 2010. Studies assessing the quality of PRO questionnaires in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated by the psychometric properties of the outcome measures. The quality of the articles investigating the questionnaires was assessed by the COSMIN list.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Five articles identified three questionnaires; the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS). The NAHS scored best on the content validity, whereas the HOS scored best on agreement, internal consistency, reliability and responsiveness. The quality of the articles describing the HOS scored highest. The NAHS is the best quality questionnaire. The articles describing the HOS are the best quality articles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This systematic review shows that there is no conclusive evidence for the use of a single patient-reported outcome questionnaire in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Based on available psychometric evidence we recommend using a combination of the NAHS and the HOS for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/117
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van Cingel Robert
Tijssen Marsha
van Melick Nicky
de Visser Enrico
spellingShingle van Cingel Robert
Tijssen Marsha
van Melick Nicky
de Visser Enrico
Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet van Cingel Robert
Tijssen Marsha
van Melick Nicky
de Visser Enrico
author_sort van Cingel Robert
title Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
title_short Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
title_full Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
title_sort patient-reported outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2011-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hip arthroscopies are often used in the treatment of intra-articular hip injuries. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are an important parameter in evaluating treatment. It is unclear which PRO questionnaires are specifically available for hip arthroscopy patients. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate which PRO questionnaires are valid and reliable in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A search was conducted in Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Pedro, EMBASE and Web of Science from 1931 to October 2010. Studies assessing the quality of PRO questionnaires in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated by the psychometric properties of the outcome measures. The quality of the articles investigating the questionnaires was assessed by the COSMIN list.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Five articles identified three questionnaires; the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS). The NAHS scored best on the content validity, whereas the HOS scored best on agreement, internal consistency, reliability and responsiveness. The quality of the articles describing the HOS scored highest. The NAHS is the best quality questionnaire. The articles describing the HOS are the best quality articles.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This systematic review shows that there is no conclusive evidence for the use of a single patient-reported outcome questionnaire in the evaluation of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Based on available psychometric evidence we recommend using a combination of the NAHS and the HOS for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/117
work_keys_str_mv AT vancingelrobert patientreportedoutcomequestionnairesforhiparthroscopyasystematicreviewofthepsychometricevidence
AT tijssenmarsha patientreportedoutcomequestionnairesforhiparthroscopyasystematicreviewofthepsychometricevidence
AT vanmelicknicky patientreportedoutcomequestionnairesforhiparthroscopyasystematicreviewofthepsychometricevidence
AT devisserenrico patientreportedoutcomequestionnairesforhiparthroscopyasystematicreviewofthepsychometricevidence
_version_ 1725653703008976896