A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Abstract The feasible of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains controversial when compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarise the available evidence to compare MIPD vs OPD. We systemically searched PubMed, EMBASE...
Main Authors: | Zhanwei Zhao, Zifang Yin, Zhenning Hang, Gang Ji, Quanxin Feng, Qingchuan Zhao |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02488-4 |
Similar Items
-
Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
by: Han Qin, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery
by: Ke Chen, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Trends in Oncology: an Updated Review of Minimally Invasive Surgery vs. Traditional Open Surgery
by: Lee Kyuwon, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis
by: Shih-Min Yin, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 62 studies involving 250,157 participants
by: Zhanwei Zhao, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)