When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.

The option to choose between several courses of action is often associated with the feeling of being in control. Yet, in certain situations, one may prefer to decline such agency and instead leave the choice to others. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we provide evi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birte U Forstmann, Uta Wolfensteller, Jan Derrfuss, Jane Neumann, Marcel Brass, K Richard Ridderinkhof, D Yves von Cramon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-04-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2290971?pdf=render
id doaj-9ee80ed6cd5149e791fa6b4e43a127cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ee80ed6cd5149e791fa6b4e43a127cd2020-11-24T22:25:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032008-04-0134e189910.1371/journal.pone.0001899When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.Birte U ForstmannUta WolfenstellerJan DerrfussJane NeumannMarcel BrassK Richard RidderinkhofD Yves von CramonThe option to choose between several courses of action is often associated with the feeling of being in control. Yet, in certain situations, one may prefer to decline such agency and instead leave the choice to others. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we provide evidence that the neural processes involved in decision-making are modulated not only by who controls our choice options (agency), but also by whether we have a say in who is in control (context). The fMRI results are noteworthy in that they reveal specific contributions of the anterior frontomedian cortex (viz. BA 10) and the rostral cingulate zone (RCZ) in decision-making processes. The RCZ is engaged when conditions clearly present us with the most choice options. BA 10 is engaged in particular when the choice is completely ours, as well as when it is completely up to others to choose for us which in turn gives rise to an attribution of control to oneself or someone else, respectively. After all, it does not only matter whether we have any options to choose from, but also who decides on that.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2290971?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Birte U Forstmann
Uta Wolfensteller
Jan Derrfuss
Jane Neumann
Marcel Brass
K Richard Ridderinkhof
D Yves von Cramon
spellingShingle Birte U Forstmann
Uta Wolfensteller
Jan Derrfuss
Jane Neumann
Marcel Brass
K Richard Ridderinkhof
D Yves von Cramon
When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Birte U Forstmann
Uta Wolfensteller
Jan Derrfuss
Jane Neumann
Marcel Brass
K Richard Ridderinkhof
D Yves von Cramon
author_sort Birte U Forstmann
title When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
title_short When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
title_full When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
title_fullStr When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
title_full_unstemmed When the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
title_sort when the choice is ours: context and agency modulate the neural bases of decision-making.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2008-04-01
description The option to choose between several courses of action is often associated with the feeling of being in control. Yet, in certain situations, one may prefer to decline such agency and instead leave the choice to others. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we provide evidence that the neural processes involved in decision-making are modulated not only by who controls our choice options (agency), but also by whether we have a say in who is in control (context). The fMRI results are noteworthy in that they reveal specific contributions of the anterior frontomedian cortex (viz. BA 10) and the rostral cingulate zone (RCZ) in decision-making processes. The RCZ is engaged when conditions clearly present us with the most choice options. BA 10 is engaged in particular when the choice is completely ours, as well as when it is completely up to others to choose for us which in turn gives rise to an attribution of control to oneself or someone else, respectively. After all, it does not only matter whether we have any options to choose from, but also who decides on that.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2290971?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT birteuforstmann whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT utawolfensteller whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT janderrfuss whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT janeneumann whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT marcelbrass whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT krichardridderinkhof whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
AT dyvesvoncramon whenthechoiceisourscontextandagencymodulatetheneuralbasesofdecisionmaking
_version_ 1725756407170465792