In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited

The article investigates the methodological foundations of Gottfried Haberler's 1937 classic Prosperity and Depression and their influence on Haberler's assessment of theories prevailing before The General Theory and of Keynes's impact on macroeconomics. It is argued that Haberler was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mauro Boianovsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Getúlio Vargas 2000-09-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Economia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402000000300003
id doaj-9ed4673d254f4546a2a57e8d6874f8d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ed4673d254f4546a2a57e8d6874f8d12020-11-24T22:59:01ZengFundação Getúlio VargasRevista Brasileira de Economia0034-71401806-91342000-09-0154330333110.1590/S0034-71402000000300003In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisitedMauro BoianovskyThe article investigates the methodological foundations of Gottfried Haberler's 1937 classic Prosperity and Depression and their influence on Haberler's assessment of theories prevailing before The General Theory and of Keynes's impact on macroeconomics. It is argued that Haberler was influenced by the ideas of the philosopher of social sciences Felix Kaufmann, whose 1936 book on methodology was instrumental in Haberler's emphasis on the distinction between tautological and empirical statements in economics. Haberler's cristicism of Hayek's capital shortage explanation of the crisis, as well as his rejection of Keynes' equilibrating mechanism through income changes and his scepticism towards econometric modelling of the business cycle, stem in large part from his views on method.<br>O artigo investiga os fundamentos metodológicos do clássico de 1937 Prosperity and Depression de Gottfried Haberler, bem como suas influências sobre a avaliação feita por Haberler das teorias dominantes antes da General Theory e do impacto de Keynes na macroeconomia. Haberler foi influenciado pelas idéias do filósofo das ciências sociais Felix Kaufmann, cujo livro de 1936 sobre metodologia foi decisivo ao levar Haberler a enfatizar a diferença entre enunciados tautológicos e empíricos em economia. A crítica de Haberler à hipótese de Hayek de que as crises são causadas por escassez de capital, bem como sua rejeição do mecanismo de Keynes de equilibração via variações no nível de renda e seu ceticismo quanto à modelagem econométrica do ciclo econômico, são provenientes em grande parte de sua visão metodológica.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402000000300003macroeconomicscanonHaberlermethodologyhistory of thought
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mauro Boianovsky
spellingShingle Mauro Boianovsky
In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
Revista Brasileira de Economia
macroeconomics
canon
Haberler
methodology
history of thought
author_facet Mauro Boianovsky
author_sort Mauro Boianovsky
title In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
title_short In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
title_full In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
title_fullStr In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
title_full_unstemmed In search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: Haberler's Prosperity and Depression revisited
title_sort in search of a canonical history of macroeconomics in the interwar period: haberler's prosperity and depression revisited
publisher Fundação Getúlio Vargas
series Revista Brasileira de Economia
issn 0034-7140
1806-9134
publishDate 2000-09-01
description The article investigates the methodological foundations of Gottfried Haberler's 1937 classic Prosperity and Depression and their influence on Haberler's assessment of theories prevailing before The General Theory and of Keynes's impact on macroeconomics. It is argued that Haberler was influenced by the ideas of the philosopher of social sciences Felix Kaufmann, whose 1936 book on methodology was instrumental in Haberler's emphasis on the distinction between tautological and empirical statements in economics. Haberler's cristicism of Hayek's capital shortage explanation of the crisis, as well as his rejection of Keynes' equilibrating mechanism through income changes and his scepticism towards econometric modelling of the business cycle, stem in large part from his views on method.<br>O artigo investiga os fundamentos metodológicos do clássico de 1937 Prosperity and Depression de Gottfried Haberler, bem como suas influências sobre a avaliação feita por Haberler das teorias dominantes antes da General Theory e do impacto de Keynes na macroeconomia. Haberler foi influenciado pelas idéias do filósofo das ciências sociais Felix Kaufmann, cujo livro de 1936 sobre metodologia foi decisivo ao levar Haberler a enfatizar a diferença entre enunciados tautológicos e empíricos em economia. A crítica de Haberler à hipótese de Hayek de que as crises são causadas por escassez de capital, bem como sua rejeição do mecanismo de Keynes de equilibração via variações no nível de renda e seu ceticismo quanto à modelagem econométrica do ciclo econômico, são provenientes em grande parte de sua visão metodológica.
topic macroeconomics
canon
Haberler
methodology
history of thought
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402000000300003
work_keys_str_mv AT mauroboianovsky insearchofacanonicalhistoryofmacroeconomicsintheinterwarperiodhaberlersprosperityanddepressionrevisited
_version_ 1725645937946132480