Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bern Open Publishing
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Eye Movement Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563 |
id |
doaj-9ed14a15f0624f0d8e20e094967ef530 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9ed14a15f0624f0d8e20e094967ef5302021-05-28T13:33:39ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922019-05-0112110.16910/jemr.12.1.6Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movementsJosé A. León0José David Moreno1Inmaculada Escudero2Johanna K. Kaakinen3Universidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUNEDUniversity of Turku Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergraduate students were instructed to read six expository texts in order to respond a causal question introduced in the end of the first paragraph. After reading, participants produced an oral summary of the text. Based on the quality of the summaries, participants were divided into three groups: High, Medium and Low Quality Summaries. The results revealed that readers who produced High Quality Summaries made significantly more and longer fixations and regressions in the question-relevant parts of texts when compared to the other two summary groups. These results suggest that the summary task performance could be a good predictor of the reading strategies utilized during reading. https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563summary qualitystrategic selective processingeye movementsreading comprehensionindividual differences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
José A. León José David Moreno Inmaculada Escudero Johanna K. Kaakinen |
spellingShingle |
José A. León José David Moreno Inmaculada Escudero Johanna K. Kaakinen Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements Journal of Eye Movement Research summary quality strategic selective processing eye movements reading comprehension individual differences |
author_facet |
José A. León José David Moreno Inmaculada Escudero Johanna K. Kaakinen |
author_sort |
José A. León |
title |
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements |
title_short |
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements |
title_full |
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements |
title_fullStr |
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements |
title_sort |
selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: evidence from eye movements |
publisher |
Bern Open Publishing |
series |
Journal of Eye Movement Research |
issn |
1995-8692 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergraduate students were instructed to read six expository texts in order to respond a causal question introduced in the end of the first paragraph. After reading, participants produced an oral summary of the text. Based on the quality of the summaries, participants were divided into three groups: High, Medium and Low Quality Summaries. The results revealed that readers who produced High Quality Summaries made significantly more and longer fixations and regressions in the question-relevant parts of texts when compared to the other two summary groups. These results suggest that the summary task performance could be a good predictor of the reading strategies utilized during reading.
|
topic |
summary quality strategic selective processing eye movements reading comprehension individual differences |
url |
https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josealeon selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements AT josedavidmoreno selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements AT inmaculadaescudero selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements AT johannakkaakinen selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements |
_version_ |
1721423812311908352 |