Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements

Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José A. León, José David Moreno, Inmaculada Escudero, Johanna K. Kaakinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:Journal of Eye Movement Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563
id doaj-9ed14a15f0624f0d8e20e094967ef530
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ed14a15f0624f0d8e20e094967ef5302021-05-28T13:33:39ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922019-05-0112110.16910/jemr.12.1.6Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movementsJosé A. León0José David Moreno1Inmaculada Escudero2Johanna K. Kaakinen3Universidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUNEDUniversity of Turku Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergraduate students were instructed to read six expository texts in order to respond a causal question introduced in the end of the first paragraph. After reading, participants produced an oral summary of the text. Based on the quality of the summaries, participants were divided into three groups: High, Medium and Low Quality Summaries. The results revealed that readers who produced High Quality Summaries made significantly more and longer fixations and regressions in the question-relevant parts of texts when compared to the other two summary groups. These results suggest that the summary task performance could be a good predictor of the reading strategies utilized during reading. https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563summary qualitystrategic selective processingeye movementsreading comprehensionindividual differences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José A. León
José David Moreno
Inmaculada Escudero
Johanna K. Kaakinen
spellingShingle José A. León
José David Moreno
Inmaculada Escudero
Johanna K. Kaakinen
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
Journal of Eye Movement Research
summary quality
strategic selective processing
eye movements
reading comprehension
individual differences
author_facet José A. León
José David Moreno
Inmaculada Escudero
Johanna K. Kaakinen
author_sort José A. León
title Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
title_short Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
title_full Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
title_fullStr Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
title_full_unstemmed Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements
title_sort selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: evidence from eye movements
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Journal of Eye Movement Research
issn 1995-8692
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Comprehension and summarizing are closely related. As more strategic and selective processing during reading should be reflected in higher quality of summaries, the aim of this study was to use eye movement patterns to analyze how readers who produce good quality summaries process texts. 40 undergraduate students were instructed to read six expository texts in order to respond a causal question introduced in the end of the first paragraph. After reading, participants produced an oral summary of the text. Based on the quality of the summaries, participants were divided into three groups: High, Medium and Low Quality Summaries. The results revealed that readers who produced High Quality Summaries made significantly more and longer fixations and regressions in the question-relevant parts of texts when compared to the other two summary groups. These results suggest that the summary task performance could be a good predictor of the reading strategies utilized during reading.
topic summary quality
strategic selective processing
eye movements
reading comprehension
individual differences
url https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/4563
work_keys_str_mv AT josealeon selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements
AT josedavidmoreno selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements
AT inmaculadaescudero selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements
AT johannakkaakinen selectiveattentiontoquestionrelevanttextinformationprecedeshighqualitysummariesevidencefromeyemovements
_version_ 1721423812311908352