Can prospective systematic reviews of animal studies improve clinical translation?
Abstract Systematic reviews are powerful tools with the potential to generate high quality evidence. Their application to animal studies has been instrumental in exposing the poor quality of these studies, as well as a catalyst for improvements in study design, conduct and reporting. It has been sug...
Main Authors: | Pandora Pound, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Translational Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02205-x |
Similar Items
-
Is it possible to overcome issues of external validity in preclinical animal research? Why most animal models are bound to fail
by: Pandora Pound, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
by: Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates
by: Cathalijn H. C. Leenaars, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
A Systematic Review Comparing Experimental Design of Animal and Human Methotrexate Efficacy Studies for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Lessons for the Translational Value of Animal Studies
by: Cathalijn Leenaars, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Exploring the Application of a Multicenter Study Design in the Preclinical Phase of Translational Research
by: Hunniford, Victoria
Published: (2020)