Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations

The article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. G. Sebyakin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science 2018-12-01
Series:Теория и практика судебной экспертизы
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435
id doaj-9ec2b322e5394b9bba9ecdf0d6b13f8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ec2b322e5394b9bba9ecdf0d6b13f8f2021-07-28T14:06:25ZrusMinistry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science Теория и практика судебной экспертизы1819-27852587-72752018-12-01134525910.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-52-59428Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling OperationsA. G. Sebyakin0Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation; Office of Investigations of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Irkutsk RegionThe article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence in this field. The author describes the main stages in the evolution of gambling equipment as a means of committing a crime, and compares the possibilities of equipment inspection by a specialist vs. a computer forensics examination. The application of these procedural forms is analyzed in the context of the origins of the gambling industry, which makes it possible to evaluate the performance of a procedural action (inspection of evidence) depending on the type of gaming equipment used. The advantages and disadvantages of both procedural forms of using specialized knowledge are described. The author addresses the persisting issue of the boundaries of expert competence when deciding whether the evidence under investigation qualifies as gaming equipment.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435gamblinggaming equipmentcomputer forensicsinspectionspecialistexpertspecialized knowledge
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. G. Sebyakin
spellingShingle A. G. Sebyakin
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
Теория и практика судебной экспертизы
gambling
gaming equipment
computer forensics
inspection
specialist
expert
specialized knowledge
author_facet A. G. Sebyakin
author_sort A. G. Sebyakin
title Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
title_short Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
title_full Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
title_fullStr Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
title_sort investigation of gaming equipment used in illegal gambling operations
publisher Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
series Теория и практика судебной экспертизы
issn 1819-2785
2587-7275
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence in this field. The author describes the main stages in the evolution of gambling equipment as a means of committing a crime, and compares the possibilities of equipment inspection by a specialist vs. a computer forensics examination. The application of these procedural forms is analyzed in the context of the origins of the gambling industry, which makes it possible to evaluate the performance of a procedural action (inspection of evidence) depending on the type of gaming equipment used. The advantages and disadvantages of both procedural forms of using specialized knowledge are described. The author addresses the persisting issue of the boundaries of expert competence when deciding whether the evidence under investigation qualifies as gaming equipment.
topic gambling
gaming equipment
computer forensics
inspection
specialist
expert
specialized knowledge
url https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435
work_keys_str_mv AT agsebyakin investigationofgamingequipmentusedinillegalgamblingoperations
_version_ 1721268216831934464