Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations
The article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435 |
id |
doaj-9ec2b322e5394b9bba9ecdf0d6b13f8f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9ec2b322e5394b9bba9ecdf0d6b13f8f2021-07-28T14:06:25ZrusMinistry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science Теория и практика судебной экспертизы1819-27852587-72752018-12-01134525910.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-4-52-59428Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling OperationsA. G. Sebyakin0Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation; Office of Investigations of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Irkutsk RegionThe article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence in this field. The author describes the main stages in the evolution of gambling equipment as a means of committing a crime, and compares the possibilities of equipment inspection by a specialist vs. a computer forensics examination. The application of these procedural forms is analyzed in the context of the origins of the gambling industry, which makes it possible to evaluate the performance of a procedural action (inspection of evidence) depending on the type of gaming equipment used. The advantages and disadvantages of both procedural forms of using specialized knowledge are described. The author addresses the persisting issue of the boundaries of expert competence when deciding whether the evidence under investigation qualifies as gaming equipment.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435gamblinggaming equipmentcomputer forensicsinspectionspecialistexpertspecialized knowledge |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. G. Sebyakin |
spellingShingle |
A. G. Sebyakin Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations Теория и практика судебной экспертизы gambling gaming equipment computer forensics inspection specialist expert specialized knowledge |
author_facet |
A. G. Sebyakin |
author_sort |
A. G. Sebyakin |
title |
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations |
title_short |
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations |
title_full |
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations |
title_fullStr |
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigation of Gaming Equipment Used in Illegal Gambling Operations |
title_sort |
investigation of gaming equipment used in illegal gambling operations |
publisher |
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science |
series |
Теория и практика судебной экспертизы |
issn |
1819-2785 2587-7275 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
The article deals with certain aspects of investigating criminal cases related to illegal organization and operation of games of chance. The focus is on the application of various procedural forms of using specialized knowledge in computer technology, as well as the limits of an expert’s competence in this field. The author describes the main stages in the evolution of gambling equipment as a means of committing a crime, and compares the possibilities of equipment inspection by a specialist vs. a computer forensics examination. The application of these procedural forms is analyzed in the context of the origins of the gambling industry, which makes it possible to evaluate the performance of a procedural action (inspection of evidence) depending on the type of gaming equipment used. The advantages and disadvantages of both procedural forms of using specialized knowledge are described. The author addresses the persisting issue of the boundaries of expert competence when deciding whether the evidence under investigation qualifies as gaming equipment. |
topic |
gambling gaming equipment computer forensics inspection specialist expert specialized knowledge |
url |
https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/435 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT agsebyakin investigationofgamingequipmentusedinillegalgamblingoperations |
_version_ |
1721268216831934464 |