Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options

With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous fla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Kearns, Panagiotis Ermogenous, Simon Myers, Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2018-11-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2017-01592.pdf
id doaj-9ebe6bb547694ed08d163e4deeff2967
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9ebe6bb547694ed08d163e4deeff29672020-11-24T23:28:37ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712018-11-0145649550310.5999/aps.2017.01592972Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction optionsMarie Kearns0Panagiotis Ermogenous1Simon Myers2Ali Mahmoud Ghanem3 1Academic Plastic Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK 1Academic Plastic Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK 1Academic Plastic Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK 1Academic Plastic Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UKWith significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular (<10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2017-01592.pdfFree tissue flapsMandibular reconstructionQuality of lifePostoperative complications
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Kearns
Panagiotis Ermogenous
Simon Myers
Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
spellingShingle Marie Kearns
Panagiotis Ermogenous
Simon Myers
Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Free tissue flaps
Mandibular reconstruction
Quality of life
Postoperative complications
author_facet Marie Kearns
Panagiotis Ermogenous
Simon Myers
Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
author_sort Marie Kearns
title Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
title_short Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
title_full Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
title_fullStr Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
title_full_unstemmed Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
title_sort osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: a focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2018-11-01
description With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular (<10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.
topic Free tissue flaps
Mandibular reconstruction
Quality of life
Postoperative complications
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2017-01592.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariekearns osteocutaneousflapsforheadandneckreconstructionafocusedevaluationofdonorsitemorbidityandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresindifferentreconstructionoptions
AT panagiotisermogenous osteocutaneousflapsforheadandneckreconstructionafocusedevaluationofdonorsitemorbidityandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresindifferentreconstructionoptions
AT simonmyers osteocutaneousflapsforheadandneckreconstructionafocusedevaluationofdonorsitemorbidityandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresindifferentreconstructionoptions
AT alimahmoudghanem osteocutaneousflapsforheadandneckreconstructionafocusedevaluationofdonorsitemorbidityandpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresindifferentreconstructionoptions
_version_ 1725548856080334848