About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora

About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora The semantic notation analyzed in this works is contained in the second stream of semantic theories presented here – in the direct approach semantics. We used this stream in our work on the Bulgarian-Polish Contrastive Grammar. Our semantic nota...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Violetta Koseska-Toszewa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences 2015-06-01
Series:Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ispan.waw.pl/journals/index.php/cs-ec/article/view/775
id doaj-9eb34c4d1c2845188c250692e270fa45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9eb34c4d1c2845188c250692e270fa452020-11-24T23:03:22ZengInstitute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of SciencesCognitive Studies | Études cognitives2392-23972015-06-01013677810.11649/cs.2013.004510About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel CorporaVioletta Koseska-Toszewa0Instytut Slawistyki PAN [Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences], Warszawa [Warsaw]About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora The semantic notation analyzed in this works is contained in the second stream of semantic theories presented here – in the direct approach semantics. We used this stream in our work on the Bulgarian-Polish Contrastive Grammar. Our semantic notation distinguishes quantificational meanings of names and predicates, and indicates aspectual and temporal meanings of verbs. It relies on logical scope-based quantification and on the contemporary theory of processes, known as “Petri nets”. Thanks to it, we can distinguish precisely between a language form and its contents, e.g. a perfective verb form has two meanings: an event or a sequence of events and states, finally ended with an event. An imperfective verb form also has two meanings: a state or a sequence of states and events, finally ended with a state. In turn, names are quantified universally or existentially when they are “undefined”, and uniquely (using the iota operator) when they are “defined”. A fact worth emphasizing is the possibility of quantifying not only names, but also the predicate, and then quantification concerns time and aspect.  This is a novum in elaborating sentence-level semantics in parallel corpora. For this reason, our semantic notation is manual. We are hoping that it will raise the interest of computer scientists working on automatic methods for processing the given natural languages. Semantic annotation defined like in this work will facilitate contrastive studies of natural languages, and this in turn will verify the results of those studies, and will certainly facilitate human and machine translations.https://ispan.waw.pl/journals/index.php/cs-ec/article/view/775direct approach to semanticssemantic annotationperfective aspectinperfective aspecteventstatePetri netsparallel corporacontrastive linguistics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Violetta Koseska-Toszewa
spellingShingle Violetta Koseska-Toszewa
About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives
direct approach to semantics
semantic annotation
perfective aspect
inperfective aspect
event
state
Petri nets
parallel corpora
contrastive linguistics
author_facet Violetta Koseska-Toszewa
author_sort Violetta Koseska-Toszewa
title About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
title_short About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
title_full About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
title_fullStr About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
title_full_unstemmed About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora
title_sort about certain semantic annotation in parallel corpora
publisher Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences
series Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives
issn 2392-2397
publishDate 2015-06-01
description About Certain Semantic Annotation in Parallel Corpora The semantic notation analyzed in this works is contained in the second stream of semantic theories presented here – in the direct approach semantics. We used this stream in our work on the Bulgarian-Polish Contrastive Grammar. Our semantic notation distinguishes quantificational meanings of names and predicates, and indicates aspectual and temporal meanings of verbs. It relies on logical scope-based quantification and on the contemporary theory of processes, known as “Petri nets”. Thanks to it, we can distinguish precisely between a language form and its contents, e.g. a perfective verb form has two meanings: an event or a sequence of events and states, finally ended with an event. An imperfective verb form also has two meanings: a state or a sequence of states and events, finally ended with a state. In turn, names are quantified universally or existentially when they are “undefined”, and uniquely (using the iota operator) when they are “defined”. A fact worth emphasizing is the possibility of quantifying not only names, but also the predicate, and then quantification concerns time and aspect.  This is a novum in elaborating sentence-level semantics in parallel corpora. For this reason, our semantic notation is manual. We are hoping that it will raise the interest of computer scientists working on automatic methods for processing the given natural languages. Semantic annotation defined like in this work will facilitate contrastive studies of natural languages, and this in turn will verify the results of those studies, and will certainly facilitate human and machine translations.
topic direct approach to semantics
semantic annotation
perfective aspect
inperfective aspect
event
state
Petri nets
parallel corpora
contrastive linguistics
url https://ispan.waw.pl/journals/index.php/cs-ec/article/view/775
work_keys_str_mv AT violettakoseskatoszewa aboutcertainsemanticannotationinparallelcorpora
_version_ 1725634149089280000