The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility
There is a particular question that has plagued classical Christian theism over the centuries. What reason could God have for creating a universe? In this article, I shall articulate the unique claims of classical theism that other rival models of God lack. I shall argue that classical theism’s uniq...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Open Theology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0110 |
id |
doaj-9e90d5fbeae74be8bdb6085452780be4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9e90d5fbeae74be8bdb6085452780be42021-10-02T19:16:07ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792020-07-016139240610.1515/opth-2020-0110opth-2020-0110The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for ImpassibilityMullins R. T.0Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomThere is a particular question that has plagued classical Christian theism over the centuries. What reason could God have for creating a universe? In this article, I shall articulate the unique claims of classical theism that other rival models of God lack. I shall argue that classical theism’s unique commitments entail that God cannot create the universe for a reason. Thus, any nonclassical model of God can claim to have the advantage over classical theism because they can affirm that God creates the universe for a reason. In Section 1, I shall articulate classical theism. In Section 2, I shall lay the groundwork for the debate by explaining what a reason is and what a creation is. In Section 3, I shall argue that a classical theist cannot affirm that God creates the universe for a reason, thus conflicting with God’s perfect rationality.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0110impassibilityrationalitycreationgod |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mullins R. T. |
spellingShingle |
Mullins R. T. The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility Open Theology impassibility rationality creation god |
author_facet |
Mullins R. T. |
author_sort |
Mullins R. T. |
title |
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility |
title_short |
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility |
title_full |
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility |
title_fullStr |
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility |
title_sort |
problem of arbitrary creation for impassibility |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Theology |
issn |
2300-6579 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
There is a particular question that has plagued classical Christian theism over the centuries. What reason could God have for creating a universe? In this article, I shall articulate the unique claims of classical theism that other rival models of God lack. I shall argue that classical theism’s unique commitments entail that God cannot create the universe for a reason. Thus, any nonclassical model of God can claim to have the advantage over classical theism because they can affirm that God creates the universe for a reason. In Section 1, I shall articulate classical theism. In Section 2, I shall lay the groundwork for the debate by explaining what a reason is and what a creation is. In Section 3, I shall argue that a classical theist cannot affirm that God creates the universe for a reason, thus conflicting with God’s perfect rationality. |
topic |
impassibility rationality creation god |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0110 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mullinsrt theproblemofarbitrarycreationforimpassibility AT mullinsrt problemofarbitrarycreationforimpassibility |
_version_ |
1716847529008562176 |