Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review

Purpose of the Research: This study reviews and evaluates the development of research on the balanced scorecard. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This is a literature study of71 articles from 21 Scopus Q1 indexed journals. The issuance year was ignored, yet the search area was restricted to busine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: . Ratnaningrum, Y. Anni Aryani, Doddy Setiawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Malaya 2020-02-01
Series:Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives
Online Access:https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/AJAP/article/view/22455
id doaj-9e8e2b0c5aa6435d9f9db6e3a2e210ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e8e2b0c5aa6435d9f9db6e3a2e210ae2021-05-13T06:32:03ZengUniversiti MalayaAsian Journal of Accounting Perspectives2672-72930128-03842020-02-01131Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review. Ratnaningrum0Y. Anni Aryani1Doddy Setiawan2Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126, Indonesia / Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Trianandra Kartasura, Jawa Tengah 57163, IndonesiaFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126, IndonesiaFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126, Indonesia Purpose of the Research: This study reviews and evaluates the development of research on the balanced scorecard. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This is a literature study of71 articles from 21 Scopus Q1 indexed journals. The issuance year was ignored, yet the search area was restricted to business, management, and accounting. The analysis is grouped into three parts, namely BSC in private sectors, BSC in public sectors, and criticism for BSC. In private sectors and SMEs, the theme is divided into benefits of BSC, implementations of BSC, limitations and other tools to improve BSC. Research finding: Although a large number of academics are sceptical about the relationship between BSC and organisational outcomes, BSC is widely used. Practitioner-oriented literature shows that it has useful values especially in improving organisational performance and strategy attainment. Based on the findings of empirical results in the private sector, SMEs, and the public sector, it can be inferred that the implementation status of the balanced scorecard shows a high level of success and minimal failure. Theoretical contribution/ Originality: The BSC has limitations, yet these findings show that BSC is beneficial enough. Practitioner/ Policy implication: The BSC remains worth considering for a performance management system. Limitation/ Implication: This literature review is limited to specific quality ratings of the academic journals. Type of article: Literature review Keywords: Balanced Scorecard, Kaplan and Norton, Management Accounting, Literature Review JEL Classification: M21, M41 https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/AJAP/article/view/22455
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author . Ratnaningrum
Y. Anni Aryani
Doddy Setiawan
spellingShingle . Ratnaningrum
Y. Anni Aryani
Doddy Setiawan
Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives
author_facet . Ratnaningrum
Y. Anni Aryani
Doddy Setiawan
author_sort . Ratnaningrum
title Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
title_short Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
title_full Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
title_fullStr Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Balanced Scorecard: Is It Beneficial Enough? A Literature Review
title_sort balanced scorecard: is it beneficial enough? a literature review
publisher Universiti Malaya
series Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives
issn 2672-7293
0128-0384
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Purpose of the Research: This study reviews and evaluates the development of research on the balanced scorecard. Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This is a literature study of71 articles from 21 Scopus Q1 indexed journals. The issuance year was ignored, yet the search area was restricted to business, management, and accounting. The analysis is grouped into three parts, namely BSC in private sectors, BSC in public sectors, and criticism for BSC. In private sectors and SMEs, the theme is divided into benefits of BSC, implementations of BSC, limitations and other tools to improve BSC. Research finding: Although a large number of academics are sceptical about the relationship between BSC and organisational outcomes, BSC is widely used. Practitioner-oriented literature shows that it has useful values especially in improving organisational performance and strategy attainment. Based on the findings of empirical results in the private sector, SMEs, and the public sector, it can be inferred that the implementation status of the balanced scorecard shows a high level of success and minimal failure. Theoretical contribution/ Originality: The BSC has limitations, yet these findings show that BSC is beneficial enough. Practitioner/ Policy implication: The BSC remains worth considering for a performance management system. Limitation/ Implication: This literature review is limited to specific quality ratings of the academic journals. Type of article: Literature review Keywords: Balanced Scorecard, Kaplan and Norton, Management Accounting, Literature Review JEL Classification: M21, M41
url https://sare.um.edu.my/index.php/AJAP/article/view/22455
work_keys_str_mv AT ratnaningrum balancedscorecardisitbeneficialenoughaliteraturereview
AT yanniaryani balancedscorecardisitbeneficialenoughaliteraturereview
AT doddysetiawan balancedscorecardisitbeneficialenoughaliteraturereview
_version_ 1721442676735213568