Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »

There are several ways to conceive collective memory. Among them, it can be seen as a re-presentation of the past or as a social representation of History (Viaud, 2003). These conceptions can help apprehend common sense representations concerning the past by making the underlying logics of knowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean Viaud
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ADR Temporalités 2005-06-01
Series:Temporalités
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/400
id doaj-9e8212899c83474c9f4578f44c778189
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e8212899c83474c9f4578f44c7781892020-11-25T00:35:50ZfraADR TemporalitésTemporalités1777-90062102-58782005-06-01310.4000/temporalites.400Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »Jean ViaudThere are several ways to conceive collective memory. Among them, it can be seen as a re-presentation of the past or as a social representation of History (Viaud, 2003). These conceptions can help apprehend common sense representations concerning the past by making the underlying logics of knowledge evident (Moscovici, 1976; Bourdieu, 1997). Two studies by questionnaire on the Vichy period have been carried out with different samples, including word associations, exercises measuring historical knowledge and various opinion scales on the “duty of memory”. The results show that representations are made of: 1) a relative paucity of historical knowledge, 2) a focus on some historical persons, places and events, 3) a content organized on a topos opposing two ideas of France, and 4) a moral imperative to remember. These results allow us to think that this principle is moreover articulated on axiological references pitting good against evil. As a result, the representations of the period are restricted to a deontic form of memory: “remembering not to forget”. Lastly, the exemplary value of this representation will be interrogated as constituting an effective protection against the repetition which it is supposed to prevent. What is finally being connected to the transmission of memory is the issue of fidelity to the past.http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/400collective memorylogics of knowledgesocial representationssurveymemorysocial memory
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean Viaud
spellingShingle Jean Viaud
Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
Temporalités
collective memory
logics of knowledge
social representations
survey
memory
social memory
author_facet Jean Viaud
author_sort Jean Viaud
title Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
title_short Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
title_full Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
title_fullStr Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
title_full_unstemmed Représentations du régime de Vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
title_sort représentations du régime de vichy ou « se souvenir de ne pas oublier »
publisher ADR Temporalités
series Temporalités
issn 1777-9006
2102-5878
publishDate 2005-06-01
description There are several ways to conceive collective memory. Among them, it can be seen as a re-presentation of the past or as a social representation of History (Viaud, 2003). These conceptions can help apprehend common sense representations concerning the past by making the underlying logics of knowledge evident (Moscovici, 1976; Bourdieu, 1997). Two studies by questionnaire on the Vichy period have been carried out with different samples, including word associations, exercises measuring historical knowledge and various opinion scales on the “duty of memory”. The results show that representations are made of: 1) a relative paucity of historical knowledge, 2) a focus on some historical persons, places and events, 3) a content organized on a topos opposing two ideas of France, and 4) a moral imperative to remember. These results allow us to think that this principle is moreover articulated on axiological references pitting good against evil. As a result, the representations of the period are restricted to a deontic form of memory: “remembering not to forget”. Lastly, the exemplary value of this representation will be interrogated as constituting an effective protection against the repetition which it is supposed to prevent. What is finally being connected to the transmission of memory is the issue of fidelity to the past.
topic collective memory
logics of knowledge
social representations
survey
memory
social memory
url http://journals.openedition.org/temporalites/400
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanviaud representationsduregimedevichyousesouvenirdenepasoublier
_version_ 1725307325554622464