Validation and Comparison of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scales in Angiogram-Negative Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients

• Main Authors: Yuanjian Fang, Shenbin Xu, Jianan Lu, Haijian Wu, Jingwei Zheng, Cameron Lenahan, Yang Cao, Sheng Chen, Zefeng Wang, Jianmin Zhang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
• Series: BioMed Research International
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9707238
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141

Numerous grading scales have been proposed to predict the outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); however, these have not been validated in angiogram-negative SAH patients. In this study, we aim to validate and compare the aneurysmal SAH grading scales in angiogram-negative SAH patients. There were 190 angiogram-negative SAH patients analyzed from January 2014 to December 2015. The outcomes were measured by delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6 or 4-6). The predictive performance of the grading scales was assessed via evaluation of distribution, trend, association, and discrimination. In regard to the distribution, none of the patients were categorized as HAIR 8 and SAH score 8. Both grading scales indicated a significant trend between scores and outcome (P<0.05), and association with the outcome (OR>1). The modified Fisher Scale (mFS), World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale (WFNS), and combined scores VASOGRADE and HAIR showed good predictive accuracy (area under the curve AUC>0.750) for DCI. The predictive accuracy in each scale performed well in predicting poor outcome, with the exception of mFS and the Subarachnoid hemorrhage Early Brain Edema Score (SEBES). However, the mFS performed with increased accuracy when predicting mRS 4-6. The VASOGRADE, HAIR, and WFNS may be valuable prognostic tools for predicting both DCI and poor outcome. The mFS can be applicable for predicting DCI and mRS 4-6. The SAH score and the Hunt-Hess were also optimal for predicting poor outcome. The predictive performance of SEBES was relatively poor compared to the other scales.