Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment

Purpose. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of cryopreserved and dehydrated human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft transplantation for macular hole (MH) and macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) repair. Materials and Methods. This retrospective, interventional case series was conducted in two hospitals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Hsuan Huang, Der-Chong Tsai, Lei-Chi Wang, Shih-Jen Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9157518
id doaj-9e6e777316ab41ebad33be2e06f59ee7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e6e777316ab41ebad33be2e06f59ee72020-11-25T03:33:34ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/91575189157518Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal DetachmentYu-Hsuan Huang0Der-Chong Tsai1Lei-Chi Wang2Shih-Jen Chen3Department of Ophthalmology, Asia University Hospital, Taichung, TaiwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanPurpose. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of cryopreserved and dehydrated human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft transplantation for macular hole (MH) and macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) repair. Materials and Methods. This retrospective, interventional case series was conducted in two hospitals. Two types of hAM grafts, namely, the dehydrated form (AmnioGen, HCT Regenerative, Taiwan) and the cryopreserved form (AmnioGraft, Bio-Tissue, Miami, FL), were consecutively used in MH surgeries. Anatomical and functional outcomes between the 2 types of hAM grafts were compared. Results. Seventeen patients (mean age: 62.1 ± 10.0 years, 9 (52.9%) males) were enrolled. Of them, 11 patients had persistent MH, 3 had MH without prior surgery, and 3 had MHRD. A cryopreserved hAM graft was used in 10 patients, and a dehydrated hAM graft was used in 8 patients. One patient used a cryopreserved hAM in the first MH surgery and a dehydrated hAM in the second surgery for extramacular hole with retinal detachment. After a 6-month follow-up, 13 (76.5%) patients had sealed MHs. The average visual acuity (VA) of cases with sealed MHs improved from 1.38 ± 0.62 to 1.12 ± 0.47 logMAR (p=0.03). In the other 4 cases with persistent MH, 3 had graft dislocation and 1 had a reopened MH with graft contraction. There were no significant differences in closure rate (80.00% vs. 71.43%, p=0.68) or VA improvement (0.19 ± 0.37 logMAR vs. 0.15 ± 0.41 logMAR, p=0.85) between the 2 kinds of hAM graft. Conclusion. This preliminary case series showed that both cryopreserved hAM and dehydrated hAM are feasible alternative grafts for either persistent or recurrent MH. Both approaches have similar anatomical and functional outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9157518
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu-Hsuan Huang
Der-Chong Tsai
Lei-Chi Wang
Shih-Jen Chen
spellingShingle Yu-Hsuan Huang
Der-Chong Tsai
Lei-Chi Wang
Shih-Jen Chen
Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Yu-Hsuan Huang
Der-Chong Tsai
Lei-Chi Wang
Shih-Jen Chen
author_sort Yu-Hsuan Huang
title Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
title_short Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
title_full Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
title_fullStr Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment
title_sort comparison between cryopreserved and dehydrated human amniotic membrane graft in treating challenging cases with macular hole and macular hole retinal detachment
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of cryopreserved and dehydrated human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft transplantation for macular hole (MH) and macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) repair. Materials and Methods. This retrospective, interventional case series was conducted in two hospitals. Two types of hAM grafts, namely, the dehydrated form (AmnioGen, HCT Regenerative, Taiwan) and the cryopreserved form (AmnioGraft, Bio-Tissue, Miami, FL), were consecutively used in MH surgeries. Anatomical and functional outcomes between the 2 types of hAM grafts were compared. Results. Seventeen patients (mean age: 62.1 ± 10.0 years, 9 (52.9%) males) were enrolled. Of them, 11 patients had persistent MH, 3 had MH without prior surgery, and 3 had MHRD. A cryopreserved hAM graft was used in 10 patients, and a dehydrated hAM graft was used in 8 patients. One patient used a cryopreserved hAM in the first MH surgery and a dehydrated hAM in the second surgery for extramacular hole with retinal detachment. After a 6-month follow-up, 13 (76.5%) patients had sealed MHs. The average visual acuity (VA) of cases with sealed MHs improved from 1.38 ± 0.62 to 1.12 ± 0.47 logMAR (p=0.03). In the other 4 cases with persistent MH, 3 had graft dislocation and 1 had a reopened MH with graft contraction. There were no significant differences in closure rate (80.00% vs. 71.43%, p=0.68) or VA improvement (0.19 ± 0.37 logMAR vs. 0.15 ± 0.41 logMAR, p=0.85) between the 2 kinds of hAM graft. Conclusion. This preliminary case series showed that both cryopreserved hAM and dehydrated hAM are feasible alternative grafts for either persistent or recurrent MH. Both approaches have similar anatomical and functional outcomes.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9157518
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhsuanhuang comparisonbetweencryopreservedanddehydratedhumanamnioticmembranegraftintreatingchallengingcaseswithmacularholeandmacularholeretinaldetachment
AT derchongtsai comparisonbetweencryopreservedanddehydratedhumanamnioticmembranegraftintreatingchallengingcaseswithmacularholeandmacularholeretinaldetachment
AT leichiwang comparisonbetweencryopreservedanddehydratedhumanamnioticmembranegraftintreatingchallengingcaseswithmacularholeandmacularholeretinaldetachment
AT shihjenchen comparisonbetweencryopreservedanddehydratedhumanamnioticmembranegraftintreatingchallengingcaseswithmacularholeandmacularholeretinaldetachment
_version_ 1715181740364922880