Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis

BackgroundDiscrepancies in outcome reporting (DOR) between protocol and published studies include inclusions of new outcomes, omission of prespecified outcomes, upgrade and downgrade of secondary and primary outcomes, and changes in definitions of prespecified outcomes. DOR can result in outcome rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jamie Kirkham, Kieran Shah, Gregory Egan, Lawrence (Nichoe) Huan, Emma Reid, Aaron M Tejani
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-01
Series:	BMJ Open
Online Access:	https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e032497.full

Similar Items

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
by: Kirkham Jamie J, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Maaike M Rademaker, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
by: McDonald Steve, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Cochrane systematic review protocols
by: Jayant N Palaskar
Published: (2015-01-01)

Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

The method quality of cross-over studies involved in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Hong Ding, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
by: Pawel Posadzki, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
by: Gøtzsche Peter C, et al.
Published: (2008-04-01)

Cochrane Corner: Evaluation of the Cochrane systematic review “Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease”
by: Daniel Caldeira, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01)

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
by: Gøtzsche Peter C, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
by: Jennifer Petkovic, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the <it>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</it>: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
by: Davey Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01)

Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.
by: Susan Armijo-Olivo, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use: cochrane systematic review
by: Ann McNeill, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
by: Zhaochen Ji, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
by: Jennifer Evans
Published: (2019-05-01)

Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study
by: Andrea Benedetti, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Training practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a cross-sectional survey of participants in the Australasian Cochrane Centre training program
by: Silagy Chris, et al.
Published: (2002-06-01)

Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
by: Georgina Imberger, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis.
by: Johanna Useem, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Scope and quality of Cochrane reviews of nutrition interventions: a cross-sectional study
by: Celeste E. Naude, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics
by: Fleming, P.S, et al.
Published: (2018)

Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.
by: Ian J Saldanha, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Nikolaos Pandis, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview.
by: Jing Hu, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal
by: Christiane Willhelm, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01)

Cochrane Corner: What is the clinical impact of oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction? Evaluation of a Cochrane systematic review
by: Daniel Caldeira, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making.
by: Antonio Montresor, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

Cochrane highlights
by: Rachel Riera, et al.

Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
by: Anja Bilandzic, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

Cochrane and its prospects in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Relying on Cochrane Croatia
by: Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01)

A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
by: Miney Paquette, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

The effects of acupuncture on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review of the literature and an update to the Cochrane Collaboration review
by: Drake, Melissa
Published: (2011)

Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
by: Xuan Zhang, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
by: Clarke Mike, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
by: Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_2vgooml6ul2fg1cpd1q7cq78t6