Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study

Abstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Carta, Claudio Conversano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-w
id doaj-9e487119179e46a6bbc291dcc190bec4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e487119179e46a6bbc291dcc190bec42021-09-19T11:10:34ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-09-0121111210.1186/s12913-021-06998-wCost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical studyAndrea Carta0Claudio Conversano1Department of Business and Economics, University of CagliariDepartment of Business and Economics, University of CagliariAbstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still lacking. Objective The cost-utility of Remdesivir, Dexamethasone and a simultaneous use of the two drugs with respect to standard of care for treatment Covid-19 hospitalized patients is evaluated, together with the effect of Remdesivir compared to the base model but based on alernative assumptions. Methods A decision tree for an hypothetical cohort of Covid-19 hospitalized patients, from an health care perspective and a one year horizon is specified. Efficacy data are retrieved from a literature review of clinical trials, whilst costs and utility are obtained from other published studies. Results Remdesivir, if health care costs are related to the days of hospitalization, is a cost saving strategy. Dexamethasone is cost effective with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>5208/QALY, and the concurrent use of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone is the most favorable strategy for higher level of willingness to pay thresholds. Moreover, if Remdesivir has a positive effect on mortality the utility is three times higher respect to base case. Whereas, if health care costs are not related to the length of patient hospitalization Remdesivir has an ICER respect to standard of care of <DOLLAR/>384412.8/QALY gained, which is not cost effective. We also find that Dexaamethasone is cost effective respect to standard care if we compute the cost for live saved with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>313.79 for life saved. The uncertainty of the model parameters is also tested through both a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusion We find that the use of Remdesivir and/or Dexamethasone is effective from an economic standpoint.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-wSars-Cov-2Covid-19RemdesivirDexamethasoneCost UtilityCost Effectiveness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Carta
Claudio Conversano
spellingShingle Andrea Carta
Claudio Conversano
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
BMC Health Services Research
Sars-Cov-2
Covid-19
Remdesivir
Dexamethasone
Cost Utility
Cost Effectiveness
author_facet Andrea Carta
Claudio Conversano
author_sort Andrea Carta
title Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
title_short Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
title_full Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
title_fullStr Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
title_full_unstemmed Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
title_sort cost utility analysis of remdesivir and dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised covid-19 patients - a hypothetical study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still lacking. Objective The cost-utility of Remdesivir, Dexamethasone and a simultaneous use of the two drugs with respect to standard of care for treatment Covid-19 hospitalized patients is evaluated, together with the effect of Remdesivir compared to the base model but based on alernative assumptions. Methods A decision tree for an hypothetical cohort of Covid-19 hospitalized patients, from an health care perspective and a one year horizon is specified. Efficacy data are retrieved from a literature review of clinical trials, whilst costs and utility are obtained from other published studies. Results Remdesivir, if health care costs are related to the days of hospitalization, is a cost saving strategy. Dexamethasone is cost effective with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>5208/QALY, and the concurrent use of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone is the most favorable strategy for higher level of willingness to pay thresholds. Moreover, if Remdesivir has a positive effect on mortality the utility is three times higher respect to base case. Whereas, if health care costs are not related to the length of patient hospitalization Remdesivir has an ICER respect to standard of care of <DOLLAR/>384412.8/QALY gained, which is not cost effective. We also find that Dexaamethasone is cost effective respect to standard care if we compute the cost for live saved with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>313.79 for life saved. The uncertainty of the model parameters is also tested through both a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusion We find that the use of Remdesivir and/or Dexamethasone is effective from an economic standpoint.
topic Sars-Cov-2
Covid-19
Remdesivir
Dexamethasone
Cost Utility
Cost Effectiveness
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-w
work_keys_str_mv AT andreacarta costutilityanalysisofremdesiviranddexamethasonetreatmentforhospitalisedcovid19patientsahypotheticalstudy
AT claudioconversano costutilityanalysisofremdesiviranddexamethasonetreatmentforhospitalisedcovid19patientsahypotheticalstudy
_version_ 1717375972954603520