Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study
Abstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-w |
id |
doaj-9e487119179e46a6bbc291dcc190bec4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9e487119179e46a6bbc291dcc190bec42021-09-19T11:10:34ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-09-0121111210.1186/s12913-021-06998-wCost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical studyAndrea Carta0Claudio Conversano1Department of Business and Economics, University of CagliariDepartment of Business and Economics, University of CagliariAbstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still lacking. Objective The cost-utility of Remdesivir, Dexamethasone and a simultaneous use of the two drugs with respect to standard of care for treatment Covid-19 hospitalized patients is evaluated, together with the effect of Remdesivir compared to the base model but based on alernative assumptions. Methods A decision tree for an hypothetical cohort of Covid-19 hospitalized patients, from an health care perspective and a one year horizon is specified. Efficacy data are retrieved from a literature review of clinical trials, whilst costs and utility are obtained from other published studies. Results Remdesivir, if health care costs are related to the days of hospitalization, is a cost saving strategy. Dexamethasone is cost effective with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>5208/QALY, and the concurrent use of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone is the most favorable strategy for higher level of willingness to pay thresholds. Moreover, if Remdesivir has a positive effect on mortality the utility is three times higher respect to base case. Whereas, if health care costs are not related to the length of patient hospitalization Remdesivir has an ICER respect to standard of care of <DOLLAR/>384412.8/QALY gained, which is not cost effective. We also find that Dexaamethasone is cost effective respect to standard care if we compute the cost for live saved with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>313.79 for life saved. The uncertainty of the model parameters is also tested through both a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusion We find that the use of Remdesivir and/or Dexamethasone is effective from an economic standpoint.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-wSars-Cov-2Covid-19RemdesivirDexamethasoneCost UtilityCost Effectiveness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Carta Claudio Conversano |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Carta Claudio Conversano Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study BMC Health Services Research Sars-Cov-2 Covid-19 Remdesivir Dexamethasone Cost Utility Cost Effectiveness |
author_facet |
Andrea Carta Claudio Conversano |
author_sort |
Andrea Carta |
title |
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
title_short |
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
title_full |
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
title_fullStr |
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost utility analysis of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised COVID-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
title_sort |
cost utility analysis of remdesivir and dexamethasone treatment for hospitalised covid-19 patients - a hypothetical study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Sars-Cov-2 is a novel corona virus associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are two treatments that have shown to be effective against the Sars-Cov-2 associated disease. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the two treatments is still lacking. Objective The cost-utility of Remdesivir, Dexamethasone and a simultaneous use of the two drugs with respect to standard of care for treatment Covid-19 hospitalized patients is evaluated, together with the effect of Remdesivir compared to the base model but based on alernative assumptions. Methods A decision tree for an hypothetical cohort of Covid-19 hospitalized patients, from an health care perspective and a one year horizon is specified. Efficacy data are retrieved from a literature review of clinical trials, whilst costs and utility are obtained from other published studies. Results Remdesivir, if health care costs are related to the days of hospitalization, is a cost saving strategy. Dexamethasone is cost effective with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>5208/QALY, and the concurrent use of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone is the most favorable strategy for higher level of willingness to pay thresholds. Moreover, if Remdesivir has a positive effect on mortality the utility is three times higher respect to base case. Whereas, if health care costs are not related to the length of patient hospitalization Remdesivir has an ICER respect to standard of care of <DOLLAR/>384412.8/QALY gained, which is not cost effective. We also find that Dexaamethasone is cost effective respect to standard care if we compute the cost for live saved with an ICER of <DOLLAR/>313.79 for life saved. The uncertainty of the model parameters is also tested through both a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusion We find that the use of Remdesivir and/or Dexamethasone is effective from an economic standpoint. |
topic |
Sars-Cov-2 Covid-19 Remdesivir Dexamethasone Cost Utility Cost Effectiveness |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06998-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreacarta costutilityanalysisofremdesiviranddexamethasonetreatmentforhospitalisedcovid19patientsahypotheticalstudy AT claudioconversano costutilityanalysisofremdesiviranddexamethasonetreatmentforhospitalisedcovid19patientsahypotheticalstudy |
_version_ |
1717375972954603520 |