Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis

<p><em>Aim of study. </em>The flammability of the main coniferous forest species of Europe, divided into two groups according to their fire regime and altitudinal distribution, was tested in an effort to detect species-specific differences that may have an influence on community-wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. P. Dimitrakopoulos, I. D. Mitsopoulos, A. Kaliva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria 2013-04-01
Series:Forest Systems
Online Access:http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/2475
id doaj-9e3ceabcb06841c4b7acff72573b484e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e3ceabcb06841c4b7acff72573b484e2020-11-24T22:24:32ZengInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaForest Systems2171-98452013-04-0122113413710.5424/fs/2013221-024751791Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesisA. P. Dimitrakopoulos0I. D. Mitsopoulos1A. Kaliva2Laboratory of forest protection. Faculty of Forestry and Natural Environment. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. P.O.Box 228. 54124, Thessaloniki.Laboratory of forest protection. Faculty of Forestry and Natural Environment. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. P.O.Box 228. 54124, Thessaloniki.Laboratory of forest protection. Faculty of Forestry and Natural Environment. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. P.O.Box 228. 54124, Thessaloniki.<p><em>Aim of study. </em>The flammability of the main coniferous forest species of Europe, divided into two groups according to their fire regime and altitudinal distribution, was tested in an effort to detect species-specific differences that may have an influence on community-wide fire regimes.</p><p><em>Area of study</em>. Conifer species comprising low- and high-elevation forests in Europe.</p><p><em>Materials and Methods. </em>The following conifer species were tested: low elevation; <em>Pinus halepensis </em>(Aleppo pine), <em>Pinus brutia </em>(Turkish pine), <em>Pinus pinaster</em> (maritime pine), <em>Pinus pinea </em>(stone pine) and <em>Cupressus sempervirens </em>(cypress), high elevation (<em>i.e.</em>, above 600 m a.s.l.); <em>Pinus sylvestris </em>(Scots pine), <em>Abies alba </em>(white fir), <em>Picea excelsa </em>(Norway spruce), <em>Abies borissii regis </em>(Macedonian fir) and <em>Pinus nigra </em>(black pine). Flammability assessment (time-to-ignition and ignition temperature) was conducted by an innovative ignition apparatus, heat content was measured with an IKA Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter and ash content by heating 5 g of plant material in a muffle furnace at 650ºC for 1 h. Differences among species was statistically analysed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test.</p><p><em>Main results. </em>The results did not distinguish separate groups among traits between fire- and non-fire-stricken communities at the individual species level.</p><p><em>Research highlights. </em>Differences in fire regimes among low and high elevation conifer forests could be attributed either to differences in flammability of the plant communities as a whole (<em>i.e.</em>, fuelbed or canopy properties vs. individual fuel properties) or to other factors (climatic or anthropogenic).</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>flammability; ignitability; heat content; ash content; conifer species; Mutch hypothesis.</p>http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/2475
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. P. Dimitrakopoulos
I. D. Mitsopoulos
A. Kaliva
spellingShingle A. P. Dimitrakopoulos
I. D. Mitsopoulos
A. Kaliva
Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
Forest Systems
author_facet A. P. Dimitrakopoulos
I. D. Mitsopoulos
A. Kaliva
author_sort A. P. Dimitrakopoulos
title Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
title_short Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
title_full Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
title_fullStr Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis
title_sort short communication. comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of europe: a test of the mutch hypothesis
publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
series Forest Systems
issn 2171-9845
publishDate 2013-04-01
description <p><em>Aim of study. </em>The flammability of the main coniferous forest species of Europe, divided into two groups according to their fire regime and altitudinal distribution, was tested in an effort to detect species-specific differences that may have an influence on community-wide fire regimes.</p><p><em>Area of study</em>. Conifer species comprising low- and high-elevation forests in Europe.</p><p><em>Materials and Methods. </em>The following conifer species were tested: low elevation; <em>Pinus halepensis </em>(Aleppo pine), <em>Pinus brutia </em>(Turkish pine), <em>Pinus pinaster</em> (maritime pine), <em>Pinus pinea </em>(stone pine) and <em>Cupressus sempervirens </em>(cypress), high elevation (<em>i.e.</em>, above 600 m a.s.l.); <em>Pinus sylvestris </em>(Scots pine), <em>Abies alba </em>(white fir), <em>Picea excelsa </em>(Norway spruce), <em>Abies borissii regis </em>(Macedonian fir) and <em>Pinus nigra </em>(black pine). Flammability assessment (time-to-ignition and ignition temperature) was conducted by an innovative ignition apparatus, heat content was measured with an IKA Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter and ash content by heating 5 g of plant material in a muffle furnace at 650ºC for 1 h. Differences among species was statistically analysed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test.</p><p><em>Main results. </em>The results did not distinguish separate groups among traits between fire- and non-fire-stricken communities at the individual species level.</p><p><em>Research highlights. </em>Differences in fire regimes among low and high elevation conifer forests could be attributed either to differences in flammability of the plant communities as a whole (<em>i.e.</em>, fuelbed or canopy properties vs. individual fuel properties) or to other factors (climatic or anthropogenic).</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>flammability; ignitability; heat content; ash content; conifer species; Mutch hypothesis.</p>
url http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/2475
work_keys_str_mv AT apdimitrakopoulos shortcommunicationcomparingflammabilitytraitsamongfirestrickenlowelevationandnonfirestrickenhighelevationconiferforestspeciesofeuropeatestofthemutchhypothesis
AT idmitsopoulos shortcommunicationcomparingflammabilitytraitsamongfirestrickenlowelevationandnonfirestrickenhighelevationconiferforestspeciesofeuropeatestofthemutchhypothesis
AT akaliva shortcommunicationcomparingflammabilitytraitsamongfirestrickenlowelevationandnonfirestrickenhighelevationconiferforestspeciesofeuropeatestofthemutchhypothesis
_version_ 1725760797100998656