Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting
A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper exam...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | MedEdPublish |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555 |
| id |
doaj-9e3723ed722a4b30b867efc371a71df4 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-9e3723ed722a4b30b867efc371a71df42020-11-25T00:49:58ZengAssociation for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)MedEdPublish2312-79962016-09-0152Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard SettingReza Vahid Roudsari0The University of ManchesterA number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper examines if such correlations can be used to standard set exam papers based on their psychometric item difficulty and discrimination index. https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555standard settingprogress testingpsychometrics |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| spellingShingle |
Reza Vahid Roudsari Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting MedEdPublish standard setting progress testing psychometrics |
| author_facet |
Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| author_sort |
Reza Vahid Roudsari |
| title |
Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_short |
Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_full |
Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_fullStr |
Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting |
| title_sort |
food for thought: a new compromised method of standard setting |
| publisher |
Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) |
| series |
MedEdPublish |
| issn |
2312-7996 |
| publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
| description |
A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper examines if such correlations can be used to standard set exam papers based on their psychometric item difficulty and discrimination index.
|
| topic |
standard setting progress testing psychometrics |
| url |
https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/555 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT rezavahidroudsari foodforthoughtanewcompromisedmethodofstandardsetting |
| _version_ |
1725250032541630464 |