LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior

Electronic books (e-book) are an interesting option compared to classic paper books. Most e-reading devices of the first generation were based on e-ink technology. With the appearance of the Apple iPad on the market, TFT-LCDs became important in the field of e-reading. Both technologies have advanta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Siegenthaler, Laura Schmid, Michael Wyss, Pascal Wurtz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2012-07-01
Series:Journal of Eye Movement Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2338
id doaj-9e299b5613d945e5a4781cde15edf37d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e299b5613d945e5a4781cde15edf37d2021-05-28T13:34:31ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922012-07-015310.16910/jemr.5.3.5LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading BehaviorEva Siegenthaler0Laura Schmid1Michael Wyss2Pascal Wurtz3Swiss Distance University of Applied SciencesUniversity of BernUniversity of BernGfK Switzerland AG, SirValUse, BielElectronic books (e-book) are an interesting option compared to classic paper books. Most e-reading devices of the first generation were based on e-ink technology. With the appearance of the Apple iPad on the market, TFT-LCDs became important in the field of e-reading. Both technologies have advantages and disadvantages but the question remains whether one or the other technology is better for reading. In the present study we analyzed and compared reading behavior when reading on e-inkreader (e-ink displays) and on tablets (TFT-LCDs) as measured by eye-tracking. The results suggest that the reading behavior on tablets is indeed very similar to the reading behavior on e-ink-reader. Participants showed no difference in fixation duration. Significant differences in reading speed and in the proportion of regressive saccades suggest that tablets, under special artificial light conditions, may even provide better legibility.https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2338e-readingreadingtablete-ink readereye movements
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva Siegenthaler
Laura Schmid
Michael Wyss
Pascal Wurtz
spellingShingle Eva Siegenthaler
Laura Schmid
Michael Wyss
Pascal Wurtz
LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
Journal of Eye Movement Research
e-reading
reading
tablet
e-ink reader
eye movements
author_facet Eva Siegenthaler
Laura Schmid
Michael Wyss
Pascal Wurtz
author_sort Eva Siegenthaler
title LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
title_short LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
title_full LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
title_fullStr LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
title_full_unstemmed LCD vs. E-ink: An Analysis of the Reading Behavior
title_sort lcd vs. e-ink: an analysis of the reading behavior
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Journal of Eye Movement Research
issn 1995-8692
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Electronic books (e-book) are an interesting option compared to classic paper books. Most e-reading devices of the first generation were based on e-ink technology. With the appearance of the Apple iPad on the market, TFT-LCDs became important in the field of e-reading. Both technologies have advantages and disadvantages but the question remains whether one or the other technology is better for reading. In the present study we analyzed and compared reading behavior when reading on e-inkreader (e-ink displays) and on tablets (TFT-LCDs) as measured by eye-tracking. The results suggest that the reading behavior on tablets is indeed very similar to the reading behavior on e-ink-reader. Participants showed no difference in fixation duration. Significant differences in reading speed and in the proportion of regressive saccades suggest that tablets, under special artificial light conditions, may even provide better legibility.
topic e-reading
reading
tablet
e-ink reader
eye movements
url https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2338
work_keys_str_mv AT evasiegenthaler lcdvseinkananalysisofthereadingbehavior
AT lauraschmid lcdvseinkananalysisofthereadingbehavior
AT michaelwyss lcdvseinkananalysisofthereadingbehavior
AT pascalwurtz lcdvseinkananalysisofthereadingbehavior
_version_ 1721423706266271744