Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past

After publication of Adam Hochschild's King Leopold's Ghost in 1998, asserting that King Leopold II had been responsible for a "holocaust" in the Congo and the heated public debate this provoked, we set out to study Belgian people's reactions to these accusations. In two stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurent Licata, Olivier Klein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bielefeld 2010-04-01
Series:International Journal of Conflict and Violence
Online Access:https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2814
id doaj-9e0b0c281bc948908ce48a94189d4295
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e0b0c281bc948908ce48a94189d42952020-11-25T02:38:44ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-04-014110.4119/ijcv-2814Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial PastLaurent LicataOlivier KleinAfter publication of Adam Hochschild's King Leopold's Ghost in 1998, asserting that King Leopold II had been responsible for a "holocaust" in the Congo and the heated public debate this provoked, we set out to study Belgian people's reactions to these accusations. In two studies we compared collective memories of and emotions associated with Belgium's colonial action in the Congo in different generations. Results show higher levels of collective guilt and support for reparative actions among young adults than among older generations. This difference can be explained either by referring to the different ideological backgrounds in which different generations were socialized, as evidenced by stark differences in collective memories of colonialism, or by referring to the influence of national identification. Indeed, people could adapt their representations of colonialism in order to avoid experiencing a social identity threat. However, evidence for the identity-protecting functions of collective memories and collective emotions was only found in the older generations: young people held negative representations of colonialism independently of their level of national identification. We refer to the normative dimension of collective guilt to interpret these results.https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2814
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laurent Licata
Olivier Klein
spellingShingle Laurent Licata
Olivier Klein
Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
author_facet Laurent Licata
Olivier Klein
author_sort Laurent Licata
title Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
title_short Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
title_full Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
title_fullStr Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
title_full_unstemmed Holocaust or Benevolent Paternalism? Intergenerational Comparisons on Collective Memories and Emotions about Belgium's Colonial Past
title_sort holocaust or benevolent paternalism? intergenerational comparisons on collective memories and emotions about belgium's colonial past
publisher University of Bielefeld
series International Journal of Conflict and Violence
issn 1864-1385
publishDate 2010-04-01
description After publication of Adam Hochschild's King Leopold's Ghost in 1998, asserting that King Leopold II had been responsible for a "holocaust" in the Congo and the heated public debate this provoked, we set out to study Belgian people's reactions to these accusations. In two studies we compared collective memories of and emotions associated with Belgium's colonial action in the Congo in different generations. Results show higher levels of collective guilt and support for reparative actions among young adults than among older generations. This difference can be explained either by referring to the different ideological backgrounds in which different generations were socialized, as evidenced by stark differences in collective memories of colonialism, or by referring to the influence of national identification. Indeed, people could adapt their representations of colonialism in order to avoid experiencing a social identity threat. However, evidence for the identity-protecting functions of collective memories and collective emotions was only found in the older generations: young people held negative representations of colonialism independently of their level of national identification. We refer to the normative dimension of collective guilt to interpret these results.
url https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2814
work_keys_str_mv AT laurentlicata holocaustorbenevolentpaternalismintergenerationalcomparisonsoncollectivememoriesandemotionsaboutbelgiumscolonialpast
AT olivierklein holocaustorbenevolentpaternalismintergenerationalcomparisonsoncollectivememoriesandemotionsaboutbelgiumscolonialpast
_version_ 1724790036135673856