Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production

This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were add...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariana Guerra, Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes, Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) 2015-03-01
Series:RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdf
id doaj-9e0a9605a45048ba977e44d3fa50f668
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e0a9605a45048ba977e44d3fa50f6682020-11-25T01:28:58ZengAssociação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea1415-65551982-78492015-03-01192270289http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20151282Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific ProductionMariana Guerra0Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes1Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho2Universidade de Brasília - UnBUniversidade de Brasília - UnBUniversidade de Brasília - UnBThis paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdfpublic administration; case study; qualitative research; method.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariana Guerra
Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes
Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho
spellingShingle Mariana Guerra
Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes
Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea
public administration; case study; qualitative research; method.
author_facet Mariana Guerra
Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes
Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho
author_sort Mariana Guerra
title Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
title_short Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
title_full Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
title_fullStr Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
title_full_unstemmed Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
title_sort case study in public administration: a critical review of brazilian scientific production
publisher Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
series RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea
issn 1415-6555
1982-7849
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.
topic public administration; case study; qualitative research; method.
url http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marianaguerra casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction
AT adalmirdeoliveiragomes casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction
AT antonioisidrodasilvafilho casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction
_version_ 1725099391580110848