Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production
This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were add...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
2015-03-01
|
Series: | RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdf |
id |
doaj-9e0a9605a45048ba977e44d3fa50f668 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9e0a9605a45048ba977e44d3fa50f6682020-11-25T01:28:58ZengAssociação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea1415-65551982-78492015-03-01192270289http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20151282Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific ProductionMariana Guerra0Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes1Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho2Universidade de Brasília - UnBUniversidade de Brasília - UnBUniversidade de Brasília - UnBThis paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and relevance to academic work in Brazil.http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdfpublic administration; case study; qualitative research; method. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mariana Guerra Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho |
spellingShingle |
Mariana Guerra Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea public administration; case study; qualitative research; method. |
author_facet |
Mariana Guerra Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes Antônio Isidro da Silva Filho |
author_sort |
Mariana Guerra |
title |
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production |
title_short |
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production |
title_full |
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production |
title_fullStr |
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case Study in Public Administration: A Critical Review of Brazilian Scientific Production |
title_sort |
case study in public administration: a critical review of brazilian scientific production |
publisher |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
series |
RAC: Revista de Administração Contemporânea |
issn |
1415-6555 1982-7849 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
This paper presents a critical review of 47 articles published between 2006 and 2011 to identify how case studies
have been applied in Brazilian research on public administration. In addition to their theoretical and
methodological characteristics, four further specific topics of interest were addressed: (a) what is meant by case
study; (b) the relationship between the phenomenon of interest and the case under investigation; (c) the possibility
of replication; and (d) how the supposed method contributes towards the development of the field of public
administration. The main inconsistencies found were: the methodological descriptions are confusing; the results
are inconsistent compared with data gathering procedures and data analysis techniques; a lack of information about
the number of interviewed individuals; and no descriptions of research variables. The results suggest the reviewed
case studies present methodological inconsistencies and limitations, which undermine their scientific value and
relevance to academic work in Brazil. |
topic |
public administration; case study; qualitative research; method. |
url |
http://www.anpad.org.br/periodicos/arq_pdf/a_1566.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marianaguerra casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction AT adalmirdeoliveiragomes casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction AT antonioisidrodasilvafilho casestudyinpublicadministrationacriticalreviewofbrazilianscientificproduction |
_version_ |
1725099391580110848 |