Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia

This contribution to the forum discusses Dickens’s representations and use of embossed systems of print for readers who were blind or visually impaired, explains the controversy surrounding the choice of system for such readers, and examines the disability rights issues involved in the debate. Notin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lillian Nayder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2014-10-01
Series:19 : Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century
Online Access:http://www.19.bbk.ac.uk/articles/719
id doaj-9e09f86842ce4553b3a6c737e778f300
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9e09f86842ce4553b3a6c737e778f3002021-06-02T13:08:11ZengOpen Library of Humanities19 : Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century1755-15602014-10-011910.16995/ntn.719632Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and LetitiaLillian Nayder0Bates CollegeThis contribution to the forum discusses Dickens’s representations and use of embossed systems of print for readers who were blind or visually impaired, explains the controversy surrounding the choice of system for such readers, and examines the disability rights issues involved in the debate. Noting the personal stake that Dickens had in the matter, the article outlines my own response to his position - in the fictional portrait of Harriet Dickens, the novelist’s blind sister-in-law, in 'Harriet and Letitia', my novel-in-progress. My work suggests how one of Dickens’s female dependents might have contested his power and control: by using a typograph to write over - or, rather, through - his own manuscripts and publications, transforming text into subtext and challenging his gendered concept of disabled expression.http://www.19.bbk.ac.uk/articles/719
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lillian Nayder
spellingShingle Lillian Nayder
Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
19 : Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century
author_facet Lillian Nayder
author_sort Lillian Nayder
title Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
title_short Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
title_full Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
title_fullStr Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
title_full_unstemmed Blindness, Prick Writing, and Canonical Waste Paper: Reimagining Dickens in Harriet and Letitia
title_sort blindness, prick writing, and canonical waste paper: reimagining dickens in harriet and letitia
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series 19 : Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century
issn 1755-1560
publishDate 2014-10-01
description This contribution to the forum discusses Dickens’s representations and use of embossed systems of print for readers who were blind or visually impaired, explains the controversy surrounding the choice of system for such readers, and examines the disability rights issues involved in the debate. Noting the personal stake that Dickens had in the matter, the article outlines my own response to his position - in the fictional portrait of Harriet Dickens, the novelist’s blind sister-in-law, in 'Harriet and Letitia', my novel-in-progress. My work suggests how one of Dickens’s female dependents might have contested his power and control: by using a typograph to write over - or, rather, through - his own manuscripts and publications, transforming text into subtext and challenging his gendered concept of disabled expression.
url http://www.19.bbk.ac.uk/articles/719
work_keys_str_mv AT lilliannayder blindnessprickwritingandcanonicalwastepaperreimaginingdickensinharrietandletitia
_version_ 1721404212429979648