Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. Methods A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon Olav Drogset, Kristina Hovde Størset, Thea Marie Nitteberg, Tone Gifstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00331-4
id doaj-9df84d14a6444d379bac2ce6133248a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9df84d14a6444d379bac2ce6133248a12021-02-14T12:44:49ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532021-02-01811910.1186/s40634-021-00331-4Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allograftsJon Olav Drogset0Kristina Hovde Størset1Thea Marie Nitteberg2Tone Gifstad3Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University HospitalNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University HospitalNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University HospitalNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University HospitalAbstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. Methods A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1–6) and 4 (range, 2–6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance. Conclusions The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00331-4Knee ligamentAllograftSurgical treatmentLigament reconstructions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jon Olav Drogset
Kristina Hovde Størset
Thea Marie Nitteberg
Tone Gifstad
spellingShingle Jon Olav Drogset
Kristina Hovde Størset
Thea Marie Nitteberg
Tone Gifstad
Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Knee ligament
Allograft
Surgical treatment
Ligament reconstructions
author_facet Jon Olav Drogset
Kristina Hovde Størset
Thea Marie Nitteberg
Tone Gifstad
author_sort Jon Olav Drogset
title Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
title_short Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
title_full Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
title_fullStr Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
title_sort clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
issn 2197-1153
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. Methods A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1–6) and 4 (range, 2–6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance. Conclusions The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.
topic Knee ligament
Allograft
Surgical treatment
Ligament reconstructions
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00331-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jonolavdrogset clinicaloutcomeafterkneeligamentreconstructionwithtendonallografts
AT kristinahovdestørset clinicaloutcomeafterkneeligamentreconstructionwithtendonallografts
AT theamarienitteberg clinicaloutcomeafterkneeligamentreconstructionwithtendonallografts
AT tonegifstad clinicaloutcomeafterkneeligamentreconstructionwithtendonallografts
_version_ 1724270083279159296